Document

 1 10|       written what we call the "Caroline Books," and these exercised
 2 11|              EXAMINATION OF THE CAROLINE BOOKS. ~I. Authorship of
 3 11|    BOOKS. ~I. Authorship of the Caroline Books. ~I find that many
 4 11|      speak frequently of these "Caroline Books," and refer to them
 5 11|         IV., cap. vj., of these Caroline Books. (On this point see
 6 11|     VIth. ~II. Authority of the Caroline Books. ~But be their authorship
 7 11|       not occur verbatim in the Caroline books, but are in some eases
 8 11| received were extracts from the Caroline Books, made by the Council
 9 11|      conclusion, viz., that the Caroline Books are an expansion of
10 11|         the authenticity of the Caroline Books altogether, (Vide
11 11|            III. Contents of the Caroline Books. ~If the authorship
12 11|         I am convinced that the Caroline books, the decree of Frankfort,
13 11|          then the author of the Caroline books is thrown into a dark
14 11|        dogmatic teaching of the Caroline Books. This is, in short,
15 11|     doctrinal foundation of the Caroline books, viz.: the absolute
16 11|     when we come to examine the Caroline Books, we are not astonished
17 11|   companion (contribulum in the Caroline Books) of the Father and
18 11|       keenly that he thinks the Caroline Books attribute the words
19 11|      contents and spirit of the Caroline Books. Binius indeed says
20 11|     bungling on the part of the Caroline divines and of the French
21 11|    these books ( 400). ~(1) The Caroline Books condemn passages which
22 11|   nature of the contents of the Caroline Books as we now have them,
23 13|        curious that besides the Caroline Books and the second canon
24 13|        and to have approved the Caroline books. The whole story was
25 14|      history with regard to the Caroline books, to the action of