Chapter,Paragraph,Number

 1 Pre          |     year 2000. Some outstanding persons and well-known experts from
 2 Pre          |     which are shared by so many persons of good will, redound to
 3  I”, 2,5     |        is presumed. ~Some other persons who live together justify
 4  I”, 2,5     |      facto unions are formed by persons who were previously divorced
 5  I”, 2,5     |      the negative experience of persons who have been traumatized
 6  I”, 2,5     |          It is not uncommon for persons living together in a de
 7  I”, 2,5     |   living one’s sexuality. These persons consider marriage as something
 8  I”, 2,6     |      positive choice. Sometimes persons who are living together
 9  I”, 2,6     | developed systems where elderly persons form de facto relationships
10  I”, 3,8     |      identity of the role which persons of a determined sex play
11  I”, 3,8     |       are complementary because persons live in society according
12 II”, 1,11    |  protected as such. Two or more persons may decide to live together,
13 II”, 2,12    |     they are formed by concrete persons with their own vision of
14 II”, 2,12    |       choice and the dignity of persons which may be in error. However,
15 II”, 2,12    |    social than rational.[9][9] ~Persons can meet and refer to shared
16 III”, 1,14   |       the good will of concrete persons; it takes on an institutional
17 III”, 3,19   |         and women, for both are persons equally [28][28] (although
18 III”, 3,22   | safeguarding the dignity of all persons. The central nucleus and
19 III”, 3,22   |       conjugal love between two persons who have equal dignity but
20 III”, 3,22   |         even for unions between persons of the same sex”.[35][35] ~
21 III”, 3,22   |    sentimental love between two persons: this characteristic is
22 III”, 4,23   |        status to unions between persons of the same sex. It is opposed,
23 III”, 4,23   |      discriminate against these persons in any way. It is the common
24 IV”, 2,25    |      dimension of being married persons postulates a principle of
25 IV”, 2,26    |      hand, the dignity of human persons requires their origin to
26 IV”, 2,27    |   confirm their full dignity as persons who are valued and loved
27 IV”, 2,27    |       At the same time, elderly persons can look to the future with
28  V”, 1,31    |      community between baptized persons. The Magisterium of the
29  V”, 2,32    |       marriage between baptized persons, ratified and consummated.[
30  V”, 2,32    |        union is innate in human persons, and the juridical aspect
31  V”, 3,33    |       marriage between baptized persons, both in its moment in fieri –
32  V”, 3,35    |     about to contract. Baptized persons do not present themselves
33 VI”, 4,43    |    comes up repeatedly: Are the persons contracting marriage really
34 VI”, 4,44    |  illusory reality to which only persons with very special preparation
35 VI”, 7,47    |     less unthinkable. For these persons, the reality of marriage
36 VI”, 7,47    |    Therefore, it is an evil for persons, families and societies.
37 VI”, 8,49    |     problems and the choices of persons living in de facto unions
38 VI”, 8,49    |      Respect for the dignity of persons is not subject to discussion.
39 VI”, 8,49    |   circumstances and respect for persons are not equivalent to a
40 VI”, 8,49    |         is an essential good of persons and a factor of authentic
41 VI”, 8,49    |       some of these unions. The persons who find themselves in these
42 Conclu”, 0,50|         the relationship of two persons of the same sex and the
43 Conclu”, 0,50|         adoption of children by persons living in a homosexual relation.