Chapter,Paragraph,Number
1 Intro”, 0,1 | insist on their institutional recognition and even their equivalence
2 Intro”, 0,1 | to the danger that such recognition and equivalence would represent
3 Intro”, 0,1 | taken up of the juridical recognition and equivalency of de facto
4 I”, 1,3 | justify the institutional recognition of de facto unions. In this
5 I”, 2,5 | from this, a certain social recognition is presumed. ~Some other
6 I”, 3,7 | and the attempt to gain recognition and equivalency for de facto
7 I”, 3,8 | integrated into a process of recognition of one’s being and, consequently,
8 I”, 3,8 | personality is achieved as recognition of the fullness of the person’
9 II”, 1,11 | private level. Their public recognition or equivalency to marriage,
10 II”, 2,12 | presumption to have public recognition does not only affect the
11 III”, 1,14 | institutional character of public recognition by the State of the choice
12 III”, 1,14 | choice of conjugal life. The recognition, protection and promotion
13 III”, 1,15 | trivialization. Some affirm that recognition and equivalency of de facto
14 III”, 2 | Recognition and equivalence of de facto
15 III”, 2,16 | 16) Through public recognition of de facto unions, an asymmetrical
16 III”, 2,16 | mind that their juridical recognition is the first step toward
17 III”, 2,16 | rather the social need for recognition, by the legal system, of
18 III”, 2,17 | recognize.[21][21] This is a recognition in justice of the essential
19 IV”, 2,25 | identity has a right to public recognition which society should give,
20 VI”, 2,38 | above cultures.[87][87] This recognition of the truth about marriage
21 Conclu”, 0,50| solution of granting them recognition and placing them on a public
22 Conclu”, 0,50| implies a profound lack of recognition of the anthropological truth
23 Conclu”, 0,50| openness to life. This lack of recognition is still more grave when
|