Chapter,Paragraph,Number

 1  I”, 1,2     |        common element is that of being forms of cohabitation (of
 2  I”, 3,8     |      According to this ideology, being a man or a woman is not
 3  I”, 3,8     | progressively gains awareness of being “him/herself”, an awareness
 4  I”, 3,8     |          of recognition of one’s being and, consequently, of the
 5  I”, 3,8     |        sexual dimension of one’s being. This is therefore awareness
 6 II”, 2,12    |        therefore social; a human being is no less social than rational.[
 7 III”, 3,22   |       the structure of the human being, the woman and the man:
 8 III”, 4,23   |      very structure of the human being. Another obstacle is the
 9 IV”, 2,25    |          the social dimension of being married persons postulates
10 IV”, 2,25    |          pertains to the area of being—and not just of acting,
11 IV”, 2,26    |  permanent union that comes from being spouses. This then is a
12 IV”, 3,29    |        treat them accordingly as being different. “The institutional
13 VI”, 2,38    |     truth in the depths of one’s being, “propter duritiam cordis”,
14 VI”, 3,40    | Christian families because they, being the subjects of evangelization,
15 VI”, 4,44    |      other eras, to young people being unprepared for marriage.
16 Conclu”, 0,50|          universal principles of being and correctly draws from
17 Conclu”, 0,50|        the profound truth of his being”. JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical