Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library
Alphabetical    [«  »]
undue 1
unhappily 1
union 28
unions 97
uniquely 2
unit 3
unitary 3
Frequency    [«  »]
117 which
109 on
103 are
97 unions
93 not
87 de
85 facto
Pontifical Council for the Family
Family, marriage and de facto unions

IntraText - Concordances

unions

   Chapter,Paragraph,Number
1 Pre | growing number of de facto unions in society as a whole, with 2 Intro”, 0,1 | The so-calledde facto unions” have been taking on special 3 Intro”, 0,1 | social aspect of de facto unions, their constitutive elements, 4 Intro”, 0,1 | equivalency of de facto unions, first with regard to the 5 I | I – “De facto Unions” ~ 6 I”, 1 | Social aspect of de facto unions  7 I”, 1,2 | 2) The termde facto unionsincludes a whole series 8 I”, 1,2 | are not marriage. De facto unions are characterized precisely 9 I”, 1,2 | is implicit in de facto unions. ~ 10 I”, 1,3 | recognition of de facto unions. In this way, de facto unions 11 I”, 1,3 | unions. In this way, de facto unions would turn into an institution, 12 I”, 1,3 | on marriage. The de facto unions would be put on a juridical 13 I”, 2 | Constitutive elements of de facto unions ~ 14 I”, 2,4 | 4) Not all de facto unions have the same social weight 15 I”, 2,4 | be pointed out that these unions imply cohabitation that 16 I”, 2,4 | cohabitation). De facto unions do not imply marital rights 17 I”, 2,4 | characteristic of de facto unions. There is also a certain 18 I”, 2,5 | 5) Some de facto unions are clearly the result of 19 I”, 2,5 | decisive choice. “Trialunions are common among those planning 20 I”, 2,5 | In other cases, de facto unions are formed by persons who 21 I”, 2,6 | 6) De facto unions are not always the result 22 I”, 2,6 | living together in these unions show that they tolerate 23 I”, 2,6 | increasing number of de facto unions is due to a disaffection 24 I”, 2,6 | unusual to find de facto unions where, from the beginning, 25 I”, 2,6 | identified with the de facto unions we are concerned with here ( 26 I”, 2,6 | the problem of de facto unions can be clearly seen if we 27 I”, 3,7 | equivalency for de facto unions. In this way, unstable situations, 28 I”, 3,7 | the phenomenon of de facto unions, as we know it today, has 29 I”, 3,8 | the phenomenon of de facto unions. ~In the integrative dynamics 30 I”, 3,8 | for marriage and de facto unions (including homosexual unions) 31 I”, 3,8 | unions (including homosexual unions) is usually justified today 32 I”, 3,8 | all kinds of consensual unions, thus ignoring the natural 33 II | on marriage and de facto unions ~ 34 II”, 1 | Family, life and de facto unions ~ 35 II”, 1,9 | between marriage and de facto unions. This is the root of the 36 II”, 1,9 | prior to it. In de facto unions, on the other hand, reciprocal 37 II”, 1,9 | institutionalize de facto unions, thereby giving them a status 38 II”, 1,10 | be violated if de facto unions were given a juridical treatment 39 II”, 1,10 | on marriage and de facto unions are neither similar nor 40 II”, 1,10 | pressure to recognize de facto unions (i.e., their “non-discrimination”) 41 II”, 1,10 | institutional status to de facto unions that is similar, or even 42 II”, 1,11 | private choice. De facto unions are the result of private 43 II”, 1,11 | different from de facto unions, commitments and responsibilities 44 II”, 2 | De facto unions and the conjugal covenant ~ 45 II”, 2,12 | The evaluation of de facto unions also includes a subjective 46 II”, 2,12 | seed that produces de facto unions. Later, with the speed of 47 II”, 2,12 | public status on de facto unions. ~ 48 II”, 2,13 | the problem of de facto unions must also be taken up from 49 II”, 2,13 | the problem of de facto unions can and must be faced from 50 III | III – De facto unions in the whole of society ~ 51 III”, 1,15 | equivalency of de facto unions should not cause excessive 52 III”, 1,15 | the problem of de facto unions to one of primary importance, 53 III”, 2 | equivalence of de facto unions discriminates against marriage ~ 54 III”, 2,16 | recognition of de facto unions, an asymmetrical juridical 55 III”, 2,16 | because it privileges de facto unions with respect to marriages 56 III”, 2,16 | the family and de facto unions equivalent, including homosexual 57 III”, 2,16 | equivalent, including homosexual unions (it is good to keep in mind 58 III”, 2,17 | as mere associations or unions, and the latter cannot enjoy 59 III”, 2,18 | groups that promote de facto unions, but rather the energetic 60 III”, 3 | marriage and “de factounions ~ 61 III”, 3,22 | phenomenon of mere de facto unions (cf. Familiaris Consortio, 62 III”, 3,22 | dignity of marriage even for unions between persons of the same 63 III”, 4,23 | grantmaritalstatus to unions between persons of the same 64 III”, 4,23 | to be considered de facto unions, the moral and juridical 65 III”, 4,23 | 41] “Lastly, ‘de facto unions’ between homosexuals are 66 III”, 4,23 | presumption to make these unions equivalent to “legal marriage”, 67 V | Christian Marriage and de facto unions ~ 68 V”, 3 | love and other kinds of unions ~ 69 V”, 3,34 | Christian marriage and de facto unions. Partners in de facto unions 70 V”, 3,34 | unions. Partners in de facto unions can also say that they are 71 VI”, 1,36 | the phenomenon of de facto unions. The unions without any 72 VI”, 1,36 | of de facto unions. The unions without any legal institutional 73 VI”, 1,36 | between marriage and de facto unions, greater wisdom and more 74 VI”, 1,37 | present spread of de facto unions. ~ 75 VI”, 2 | De facto unions, factors of fragility and 76 VI”, 2,38 | the problem of de facto unions, it is important to consider 77 VI”, 2,39 | that give rise to de facto unions characterized by what is 78 VI”, 2,39 | made between the de facto unions into which some consider 79 VI”, 2,39 | are driven into de facto unions “by extreme ignorance or 80 VI”, 2,39 | the common termde facto unions” as we said earlier.[93][ 81 VI”, 2,39 | that give rise to these unions, they entailserious pastoral 82 VI”, 2,39 | spread of non-matrimonial unions due to the moral and pastoral 83 VI”, 3,40 | legislation favorable to de facto unions in many countries with an 84 VI”, 3,40 | the phenomenon of de facto unions is not on the margin of 85 VI”, 6,46 | divorce or even de facto unions, as well as the pernicious 86 VI”, 7,47 | earlier, making de facto unions equivalent to the family 87 VI”, 7,47 | attempts to make de facto unions equivalent to the family. ~ 88 VI”, 7,48 | The problem of de facto unions constitutes a real challenge 89 VI”, 8,49 | persons living in de facto unions is legitimate and, in some 90 VI”, 8,49 | for the spread of de facto unions. It must be remembered that 91 VI”, 8,49 | recovery of some of these unions. The persons who find themselves 92 Conclu”, 0,50| social phenomenon of de facto unions, and the postponing of conjugal 93 Conclu”, 0,50| at “regularizing” these unions through the celebration 94 Conclu”, 0,50| Parliament making de facto unions, including same sex unions, 95 Conclu”, 0,50| unions, including same sex unions, equal to the family, March 96 Conclu”, 0,50| Parliament making de facto unions, including same sex unions, 97 Conclu”, 0,50| unions, including same sex unions, equal to the family, March


Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (V89) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2007. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License