Chapter,Paragraph,Number
1 Pre | is the growing number of de facto unions in society
2 Intro”, 0,1 | 1) The so-called “de facto unions” have been
3 Intro”, 0,1 | considering the social aspect of de facto unions, their constitutive
4 Intro”, 0,1 | recognition and equivalency of de facto unions, first with
5 I | I – “De facto Unions” ~
6 I”, 1 | Social aspect of de facto unions
7 I”, 1,2 | 2) The term “de facto unions” includes a
8 I”, 1,2 | which are not marriage. De facto unions are characterized
9 I”, 1,2 | marriage, which is implicit in de facto unions. ~
10 I”, 1,3 | institutional recognition of de facto unions. In this way,
11 I”, 1,3 | facto unions. In this way, de facto unions would turn
12 I”, 1,3 | family based on marriage. The de facto unions would be put
13 I”, 2 | Constitutive elements of de facto unions ~
14 I”, 2,4 | 4) Not all de facto unions have the same
15 I”, 2,4 | forms of cohabitation). De facto unions do not imply
16 I”, 2,4 | consequently a characteristic of de facto unions. There is also
17 I”, 2,5 | 5) Some de facto unions are clearly
18 I”, 2,5 | includes. ~In other cases, de facto unions are formed
19 I”, 2,5 | persons living together in a de facto union to make their
20 I”, 2,6 | 6) De facto unions are not always
21 I”, 2,6 | the increasing number of de facto unions is due to a
22 I”, 2,6 | it is not unusual to find de facto unions where, from
23 I”, 2,6 | not be identified with the de facto unions we are concerned
24 I”, 2,6 | diversity of the problem of de facto unions can be clearly
25 I”, 2,6 | where elderly persons form de facto relationships because
26 I”, 3,7 | recognition and equivalency for de facto unions. In this way,
27 I”, 3,7 | which the phenomenon of de facto unions, as we know
28 I”, 3,8 | influence on the phenomenon of de facto unions. ~In the integrative
29 I”, 3,8 | status for marriage and de facto unions (including
30 II | Family based on marriage and de facto unions ~
31 II”, 1 | Family, life and de facto unions ~
32 II”, 1,9 | differences between marriage and de facto unions. This is the
33 II”, 1,9 | community that originates in a de facto union. The family
34 II”, 1,9 | that is prior to it. In de facto unions, on the other
35 II”, 1,9 | must not institutionalize de facto unions, thereby giving
36 II”, 1,10 | justice would be violated if de facto unions were given
37 II”, 1,10 | family based on marriage and de facto unions are neither
38 II”, 1,10 | exerting pressure to recognize de facto unions (i.e., their “
39 II”, 1,10 | institutional status to de facto unions that is similar,
40 II”, 1,11 | in this private choice. De facto unions are the result
41 II”, 1,11 | marriage, different from de facto unions, commitments
42 II”, 2 | De facto unions and the conjugal
43 II”, 2,12 | 12) The evaluation of de facto unions also includes
44 II”, 2,12 | in error. However, in a de facto union, the presumption
45 II”, 2,12 | now—the seed that produces de facto unions. Later, with
46 II”, 2,12 | confer public status on de facto unions. ~
47 II”, 2,13 | problem, the problem of de facto unions must also be
48 II”, 2,13 | Consequently, the problem of de facto unions can and must
49 III | III – De facto unions in the whole
50 III”, 1,15 | recognition and equivalency of de facto unions should not
51 III”, 1,15 | of raising the problem of de facto unions to one of primary
52 III”, 2 | Recognition and equivalence of de facto unions discriminates
53 III”, 2,16 | Through public recognition of de facto unions, an asymmetrical
54 III”, 2,16 | towards the partners in a de facto union, they in turn
55 III”, 2,16 | situation because it privileges de facto unions with respect
56 III”, 2,16 | attempts to make the family and de facto unions equivalent,
57 III”, 2,18 | pressure groups that promote de facto unions, but rather
58 III”, 3 | difference between marriage and “de facto” unions ~
59 III”, 3,22 | growing phenomenon of mere de facto unions (cf. Familiaris
60 III”, 3,22 | difference between a mere de facto union –even though
61 III”, 4,23 | demand to be considered de facto unions, the moral
62 III”, 4,23 | relevance.[41][41] “Lastly, ‘de facto unions’ between homosexuals
63 V | Christian Marriage and de facto unions ~
64 V”, 3,34 | between Christian marriage and de facto unions. Partners in
65 V”, 3,34 | facto unions. Partners in de facto unions can also say
66 VI”, 1,36 | challenged by the phenomenon of de facto unions. The unions
67 VI”, 1,36 | ones between marriage and de facto unions, greater wisdom
68 VI”, 1,37 | influence the present spread of de facto unions. ~
69 VI”, 2 | De facto unions, factors of
70 VI”, 2,38 | discernment of the problem of de facto unions, it is important
71 VI”, 2,39 | fragility that give rise to de facto unions characterized
72 VI”, 2,39 | must be made between the de facto unions into which
73 VI”, 2,39 | those who are driven into de facto unions “by extreme
74 VI”, 2,39 | included under the common term “de facto unions” as we said
75 VI”, 3,40 | legislation favorable to de facto unions in many countries
76 VI”, 3,40 | because the phenomenon of de facto unions is not on the
77 VI”, 6,46 | adultery, divorce or even de facto unions, as well as
78 VI”, 7,47 | we said earlier, making de facto unions equivalent
79 VI”, 7,47 | legislative attempts to make de facto unions equivalent
80 VI”, 7,48 | 48) The problem of de facto unions constitutes
81 VI”, 8,49 | choices of persons living in de facto unions is legitimate
82 VI”, 8,49 | reasons for the spread of de facto unions. It must be
83 Conclu”, 0,50| the social phenomenon of de facto unions, and the postponing
84 Conclu”, 0,50| Sanger (1879-1966) and Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986), cannot
85 Conclu”, 0,50| European Parliament making de facto unions, including
86 Conclu”, 0,50| 19][19] ST. AUGUSTINE, De libero arbitrio, I,5,11. ~~~ ~~~[
87 Conclu”, 0,50| European Parliament making de facto unions, including
|