Chapter,Paragraph,Number
1 Pre | the growing number of de facto unions in society as a whole,
2 Intro”, 0,1 | 1) The so-called “de facto unions” have been taking
3 Intro”, 0,1 | the social aspect of de facto unions, their constitutive
4 Intro”, 0,1 | recognition and equivalency of de facto unions, first with regard
5 I | I – “De facto Unions” ~
6 I”, 1 | Social aspect of de facto unions
7 I”, 1,2 | 2) The term “de facto unions” includes a whole
8 I”, 1,2 | which are not marriage. De facto unions are characterized
9 I”, 1,2 | which is implicit in de facto unions. ~
10 I”, 1,3 | institutional recognition of de facto unions. In this way, de
11 I”, 1,3 | unions. In this way, de facto unions would turn into an
12 I”, 1,3 | based on marriage. The de facto unions would be put on a
13 I”, 2 | Constitutive elements of de facto unions ~
14 I”, 2,4 | 4) Not all de facto unions have the same social
15 I”, 2,4 | forms of cohabitation). De facto unions do not imply marital
16 I”, 2,4 | consequently a characteristic of de facto unions. There is also a
17 I”, 2,5 | 5) Some de facto unions are clearly the result
18 I”, 2,5 | includes. ~In other cases, de facto unions are formed by persons
19 I”, 2,5 | living together in a de facto union to make their rejection
20 I”, 2,6 | 6) De facto unions are not always the
21 I”, 2,6 | increasing number of de facto unions is due to a disaffection
22 I”, 2,6 | is not unusual to find de facto unions where, from the beginning,
23 I”, 2,6 | be identified with the de facto unions we are concerned
24 I”, 2,6 | diversity of the problem of de facto unions can be clearly seen
25 I”, 2,6 | elderly persons form de facto relationships because they
26 I”, 3,7 | recognition and equivalency for de facto unions. In this way, unstable
27 I”, 3,7 | which the phenomenon of de facto unions, as we know it today,
28 I”, 3,8 | on the phenomenon of de facto unions. ~In the integrative
29 I”, 3,8 | status for marriage and de facto unions (including homosexual
30 II | based on marriage and de facto unions ~
31 II”, 1 | Family, life and de facto unions ~
32 II”, 1,9 | between marriage and de facto unions. This is the root
33 II”, 1,9 | that originates in a de facto union. The family community
34 II”, 1,9 | that is prior to it. In de facto unions, on the other hand,
35 II”, 1,9 | not institutionalize de facto unions, thereby giving them
36 II”, 1,10 | would be violated if de facto unions were given a juridical
37 II”, 1,10 | based on marriage and de facto unions are neither similar
38 II”, 1,10 | pressure to recognize de facto unions (i.e., their “non-discrimination”)
39 II”, 1,10 | institutional status to de facto unions that is similar,
40 II”, 1,11 | this private choice. De facto unions are the result of
41 II”, 1,11 | marriage, different from de facto unions, commitments and
42 II”, 2 | De facto unions and the conjugal
43 II”, 2,12 | 12) The evaluation of de facto unions also includes a subjective
44 II”, 2,12 | error. However, in a de facto union, the presumption to
45 II”, 2,12 | the seed that produces de facto unions. Later, with the
46 II”, 2,12 | confer public status on de facto unions. ~
47 II”, 2,13 | problem, the problem of de facto unions must also be taken
48 II”, 2,13 | Consequently, the problem of de facto unions can and must be faced
49 III | III – De facto unions in the whole of society ~
50 III”, 1,15 | recognition and equivalency of de facto unions should not cause
51 III”, 1,15 | raising the problem of de facto unions to one of primary
52 III”, 2 | Recognition and equivalence of de facto unions discriminates against
53 III”, 2,16 | public recognition of de facto unions, an asymmetrical
54 III”, 2,16 | towards the partners in a de facto union, they in turn would
55 III”, 2,16 | because it privileges de facto unions with respect to marriages
56 III”, 2,16 | to make the family and de facto unions equivalent, including
57 III”, 2,18 | pressure groups that promote de facto unions, but rather the energetic
58 III”, 3 | between marriage and “de facto” unions ~
59 III”, 3,22 | growing phenomenon of mere de facto unions (cf. Familiaris Consortio,
60 III”, 3,22 | difference between a mere de facto union –even though it claims
61 III”, 4,23 | demand to be considered de facto unions, the moral and juridical
62 III”, 4,23 | relevance.[41][41] “Lastly, ‘de facto unions’ between homosexuals
63 V | Christian Marriage and de facto unions ~
64 V”, 3,34 | Christian marriage and de facto unions. Partners in de facto
65 V”, 3,34 | facto unions. Partners in de facto unions can also say that
66 VI”, 1,36 | by the phenomenon of de facto unions. The unions without
67 VI”, 1,36 | between marriage and de facto unions, greater wisdom and
68 VI”, 1,37 | the present spread of de facto unions. ~
69 VI”, 2 | De facto unions, factors of fragility
70 VI”, 2,38 | discernment of the problem of de facto unions, it is important
71 VI”, 2,39 | fragility that give rise to de facto unions characterized by
72 VI”, 2,39 | must be made between the de facto unions into which some consider
73 VI”, 2,39 | those who are driven into de facto unions “by extreme ignorance
74 VI”, 2,39 | under the common term “de facto unions” as we said earlier.[
75 VI”, 3,40 | legislation favorable to de facto unions in many countries
76 VI”, 3,40 | because the phenomenon of de facto unions is not on the margin
77 VI”, 6,46 | adultery, divorce or even de facto unions, as well as the pernicious
78 VI”, 7,47 | said earlier, making de facto unions equivalent to the
79 VI”, 7,47 | legislative attempts to make de facto unions equivalent to the
80 VI”, 7,48 | 48) The problem of de facto unions constitutes a real
81 VI”, 8,49 | of persons living in de facto unions is legitimate and,
82 VI”, 8,49 | reasons for the spread of de facto unions. It must be remembered
83 Conclu”, 0,50| social phenomenon of de facto unions, and the postponing
84 Conclu”, 0,50| European Parliament making de facto unions, including same sex
85 Conclu”, 0,50| European Parliament making de facto unions, including same sex
|