Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library
Alphabetical    [«  »]
smaller 1
so 12
so-called 5
social 70
socialization 1
socially 2
societies 3
Frequency    [«  »]
77 with
76 from
73 no
70 social
70 their
69 or
62 good
Pontifical Council for the Family
Family, marriage and de facto unions

IntraText - Concordances

social

   Chapter,Paragraph,Number
1 Pre | grave repercussions of this social and pastoral situation, 2 Intro”, 0,1 | document, after considering the social aspect of de facto unions, 3 Intro”, 0,1 | deals with the family as a social value, the objective values 4 I”, 1 | Social aspect of de facto unions  5 I”, 1,3 | it here.[3][3] It is the social dimension of the problem 6 I”, 1,3 | regulating one context of social and juridical cohabitation, 7 I”, 1,3 | necessary for the whole social body. ~ 8 I”, 2,4 | facto unions have the same social weight or the same motivations. 9 I”, 2,5 | different from this, a certain social recognition is presumed. ~ 10 I”, 2,5 | become important from a social viewpoint in the more economically 11 I”, 2,6 | characteristic and well-defined social problem. This kind of union 12 I”, 2,6 | cause can be related to social security and welfare systems. 13 I”, 3,7 | and the globalization of social and economic phenomena have 14 I”, 3,8 | the exclusive product of social factors, with no relation 15 I”, 3,8 | female, in its way of shaping social life.[6][6] ~The ideology 16 II”, 1,9 | as an essential factor in social existence, stability and 17 II”, 1,10 | contemporary breakdown in the social moral conscience, of “weak 18 II”, 2,12 | problem from the viewpoint of social ethics: the human individual 19 II”, 2,12 | is a person and therefore social; a human being is no less 20 II”, 2,12 | a human being is no less social than rational.[9][9] ~Persons 21 II”, 2,12 | an orderly and fruitful social coexistence. Exclusive attention 22 II”, 2,12 | without referring to the social and objective dimension, 23 II”, 2,12 | person, and harmful to the social order. “Therefore, it is 24 II”, 2,12 | is the original cell of social life. It is the natural 25 II”, 2,13 | ideological prejudices, social or cultural pressures, conditioning 26 III”, 1 | Social and political dimension 27 III”, 1,14 | which benefits the entire social fabric. Such marital and 28 III”, 1,15 | 15) Another risk in the social consideration of the problem 29 III”, 1,15 | policies that really affect social life. The undifferentiated 30 III”, 1,15 | is blind to its objective social dimension. It must be kept 31 III”, 1,15 | transmission and cultivation of the social fabric as well as the essential 32 III”, 2,16 | society, but rather the social need for recognition, by 33 III”, 2,18 | the center and motor of social policy, and which cover 34 III”, 3,19 | 31][31] and, lastly, the social dimension of the conjugal 35 III”, 3,21 | justice. Since an original social institution is founded ( 36 III”, 4,23 | to understand the serious social consequences of the institutionalization 37 III”, 4,23 | 45][45] To recall the social transcendence of the truth 38 IV | Justice and the Family as a Social Good ~ 39 IV”, 1 | The family, a social good to be protected in 40 IV”, 1,24 | Marriage and the family are a social good of the first order: “ 41 IV”, 1,24 | develop all the personal and social good possible. [48][48] 42 IV”, 2 | Objective social values to be fostered ~ 43 IV”, 2,25 | 50] On the one hand, the social dimension of being married 44 IV”, 2,26 | continuity in the process of social integration and education. “ 45 IV”, 2,27 | the marriage union as a social reality, is a good. In fact, 46 IV”, 2,27 | individuals with other demands of social life”.[57][57] At the same 47 IV”, 2,28 | more than a mere juridical, social and economic unit, a community 48 IV”, 2,28 | transmit cultural, ethical, social, spiritual and religious 49 IV”, 3,29 | To summarize, the human, social and material promotion of 50 IV”, 3,29 | functions between the different social institutions: “Consequently 51 IV”, 3,29 | of a political, economic, social and juridical character, 52 IV”, 3,29 | their initiative in the social and political sphere, especially 53 IV”, 3,29 | 68] From this comes the social need to distinguish phenomena 54 V”, 1 | Christian marriage and social pluralism ~ 55 V”, 1,30 | on everyone is lost, and social life ventures on to the 56 V”, 2,32 | progressive darkening in the social conscience regarding the 57 VI”, 2,39 | institution of the family and the social and political order, or 58 VI”, 2,39 | serious scandal), as well as social consequences (destruction 59 VI”, 3,40 | urgent to rediscover the social value of the wonder of conjugal 60 VI”, 4,43 | divorce was considered a social ‘plague’ (cf. Gaudium et 61 VI”, 6,46 | these media in the loss of social sensitivity with regard 62 VI”, 7 | Social commitment ~ 63 VI”, 8,49 | understand the personal, social, cultural and ideological 64 Conclu”, 0,50| wounded in any way. Before the social phenomenon of de facto unions, 65 Conclu”, 0,50| serious breakdown of the social fabric and of the pedagogy 66 Conclu”, 0,50| that this entails, is a social phenomenon that requires 67 Conclu”, 0,50| 11. ~~~ ~~~[20][20] “Social life and its juridical apparatus 68 Conclu”, 0,50| public authorities assure the social, economic and juridical 69 Conclu”, 0,50| Marriage is an inviolable social institution; it is the foundation 70 Conclu”, 0,50| surpasses that of any other social community”. Final Declaration


Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (V89) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2007. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License