(5) Some de facto unions are clearly the result of a decisive choice. “Trial” unions are common among those
planning to marry in the future, but on the condition that they have the
experience of a union without a marriage bond. This is a kind of “conditioned
stage” for marriage, similar to “trial” marriage, [4][4] but, different from this, a certain social
recognition is presumed.
Some
other persons who live together justify this choice because of economic reasons
or to avoid legal difficulties. The real motives are often much deeper. In using this type of pretext, there is
often an underlying mentality that gives little value to sexuality. This is influenced more or less by
pragmatism and hedonism, as well as by a conception of love detached from any
responsibility. The commitment is avoided to the stability, the
responsibilities, and the rights and duties that real conjugal love includes.
In
other cases, de facto unions are formed by persons who were previously divorced
and are thus an alternative to
marriage. Through pro-divorce
legislation, marriage often tends to lose its identity in personal conscience.
In this sense, a lack of confidence in the institution of marriage should be
pointed out which sometimes comes from the negative experience of persons who
have been traumatized by a previous divorce or by their parents’ divorce. This distressing phenomenon is beginning to
become important from a social viewpoint in the more economically developed countries.
It
is not uncommon for persons living together in a de facto union to make their
rejection of marriage for ideological reasons known explicitly. This then is the choice of an alternative, a
certain way of living one’s sexuality.
These persons consider marriage as something to be rejected, something
that is opposed to their ideology, an “unacceptable form of abusing personal
well-being”, or even as “the tomb of passionate love”, expressions that denote
a lack of knowledge about the real nature of human love and sacrifice, and of
the nobility and beauty of constancy and fidelity in human relations.
|