II – The Family based on marriage and de
facto unions
Family, life and de facto unions
(9) It is useful to understand the substantial differences between marriage and
de facto unions. This is the root of the
difference between the family originating in marriage, and the community that
originates in a de facto union. The
family community comes from the covenant of the spouses’ union. The marriage that comes from this covenant
of conjugal love is not created by any public authority: it is a natural and
original institution that is prior to it.
In de facto unions, on the other hand, reciprocal affection is put in
common but, at the same time, the marriage bond, with its original public
dimension that gives the foundation to the family, is absent. The family and life form a real unit which
must be protected by society because this is the living nucleus of the
succession (procreation and education) of human generations.
In
today’s open and democratic societies, the State and the public authorities
must not institutionalize de facto unions, thereby giving them a status similar
to marriage and the family, nor much less make them equivalent to the family
based on marriage. This would be an
arbitrary use of power which does not contribute to the common good because the
original nature of marriage and the family proceeds and exceeds, in an absolute
and radical way, the sovereign power of the State. A serenely impartial perspective free from any arbitrary or
demagogical positions invites us to reflect very seriously in the different
political communities on the essential differences between the vital and
necessary contribution to the common good of the family based on marriage, and
the other reality that exists in merely emotional forms of cohabitation. It does not seem reasonable to hold that the
vital functions of family communities, whose nucleus is the stable and
monogamous institution of marriage, can be carried out in a large-scale, stable
and permanent way by merely emotional forms of cohabitation. The family based on marriage must be
carefully protected and promoted as an essential factor in social existence,
stability and peace, in a broad future vision of the society’s common interest.
|