Chapter, Paragraph
1 Intro | economic, political and religious context of today’s world,
2 1, 1 | relations between Bishops and Religious. In order to avoid the tensions,
3 1, 1 | relations between Bishops and Religious in the post-conciliar Church.
4 1 (9) | Bishops and the men and women religious present. This led to a desire
5 1, 1 | and of the people13. The religious saw themselves confirmed
6 1, 1 | belonging to a diocese – religious institute, diocesan priest –
7 1, 1 | institute, diocesan priest – religious priest, etc.), that create
8 1, 2 | ordained ministry of the religious was justified of itself.
9 1, 2 | make it possible for the religious priests to live this dimension
10 1, 2 | christifideles laici.” The religious consecration, lived in fraternity
11 1 (30)| charism and ministry and the religious’ way of living his vocation
12 1 (30)| 49). By his charism the religious, although he lives and works
13 2, 1 | and his own sins” 35.~ ~As religious, it is necessary – and even
14 2, 2 | particular spirituality43. We religious also feel called to live “
15 2, 3 | deacons, men and women religious and the laity will be expressed
16 2, 3 | God, between clergy and Religious, between associations and
17 3 | to a response to the new religious situation, to ecumenical
18 3, 1 | faith, the priests, the religious and the laity are not merely
19 3, 1 | period that the Institute or religious province is undergoing and
20 3, 1 | as of the Conferences of Religious. People tend to say that
21 3, 1 | that is the plan of the religious, emphasising the difference
22 3, 2 | insertion of the men and women religious in the particular Church
23 3, 2 | ageing of the priests and religious? Is it legitimate today
24 3, 3 | services in MCS, etc.) and religious superiors should be willing
25 3, 3 | the temporary admission of religious priests in the diocese,
26 3, 3 | living.~ ~ CICLSAL asked the religious Superiors to have special
27 3, 3 | exception cases in which religious live alone for serious reason
28 3, 3 | emphasises that the “solo” religious is never an ideal. Life
29 3, 3 | would keep the individual religious more in mind “institutionally,”
30 3, 3 | having participation of religious and laity in the elaboration
31 3, 3 | statement is valid not only for religious life but also throughout
32 4 (69)| between the Bishop and the religious.~
33 4, 2 | whether a Bishop, priest, religious or layperson, bears within
34 4, 2 | in common – Bishops and religious – in the teachings about
35 4, 2 | 13:14). It is our task as religious to emphasise in the particular
36 4, 2 | prophets, with martyrdom94. The religious’ committed involvement with
37 4, 2 | episcopal ordination or religious profession. Hope and prophecy
38 4, 3 | to our works, and to the religious experience96. ~ ~The Bishops
39 4, 3 | Areopagus of mission for the religious97. The IL lists a whole
40 4 (96)| d) The dialogue of religious experience, where persons,
41 4 (96)| persons, rooted in their own religious traditions, share their
42 4, 3 | it brings out: cultural, religious and political pluralism,
43 4, 3 | rights and dignity. The religious Institutes have a great
44 Concl | priests, men and women religious, and to all the faithful:~ ~“
|