Chapter,  Paragraph

 1   1,   1    |  Church. The identity of each vocation is not defined by defining
 2   1,   2    |   Teachers and Priests. Their vocation is expressed first and foremost
 3   1,   2    |     factor of the ministerial vocation. They are not properly living
 4   1,   2    | living out of our ministerial vocation is defective27.~ ~On the
 5   1,   2    |  community the unity of their vocation and mission. Their fraternal
 6   1,   2    |       this dimension of their vocation and mission while they work
 7   1,   2    |   evangelical counsels. Their vocation “both for the individual
 8   1,   2    |     should also express their vocation to catholicity30. As has
 9   1,   2    |       Bishops to fulfil their vocation to catholicity and openness
10   1     (30)|  religious’ way of living his vocation and mission. In fact, both
11   2,   2    |      particular Church!~ ~The vocation of a Bishop is beautiful,
12   2,   2    |       beauty of the episcopal vocation is seen, first of all, in
13   2,   2    |     us see that the episcopal vocation is, first of all, a “symbolic,”
14   2,   2    |   first of all, a “symbolic,” vocation, one that is “representative”
15   2,   2    |     that since Vatican II the vocation to the consecrated life
16   2,   2    |    representation, so too the vocation to the episcopal ministry
17   2,   2    |   Church.~ ~Rediscovering our vocation as a “sign” and “symbol”
18   2,   2    |   symbolic and representative vocation of the ordained ministers
19   3,   3    |    creative fidelity to their vocation and contribute to the particular
20   4,   3    |     consecrated life, but the vocation and mission of the laity
21   4,   3    |      consecration, from their vocation of universality, from their