PART
THREE
FACING THE CHALLENGES OF OUR TIMES
The
aim of our reflections at this Assembly is to take note of the real reasons
that motivated the birth of the USG, in order to re-read and re-interpret them
in the context of our own time. In that way, we will be able, in creative
fidelity, to revive the efforts made in the past and renew our will to serve
the consecrated life in this difficult period of transition and study.
Amongst
the great challenges of the present time, I would like to bring
out the following:
1.
Contact with the Holy Father: The Executive Council must, as it did previously, have the
possibility of direct meetings with the Holy Father.
2.
Dialog and communication with CIVCSVA. On 31 May 1998, we sent a letter to CIVCSVA. It was
suggested that the Council of 16, instead of meeting the Congregation for three
half-days a year, should meet them only twice, but for a whole day each time,
with working methods that would allow the theme to be prepared and studied
three months before the meeting, so that practical conclusions could be
reached. CIVCSVA’s response was totally negative.
They reminded us in no uncertain terms of the consultative nature of the
Council of 16 which, as stated in their reply dated 23 June 1998, "was
born as a body for exchanging experiences and for consultation, and not as a
body to reach executive conclusions or take decisions to be submitted for
approval. That would be going beyond the attributes of the Council".
3.
Dialog - exchange - commitment with the CEP. The missionary ability of religious, always at the
forefront of evangelization, constitutes a gift and a blessing for the whole
Church. Their availability and their commitment merit consideration so that
they can be living and active members in research and joint missionary responsibility.
Here we are truly beginning to take a new and positive road, thanks to H.E.
Mgr. Marcello Zago.
4.
Relations with the National Conferences of Men and Women Religious. In a world of rapid communication
and globalization, it is important to improve relations with the National
Conferences of Men and Women Religious. Although the USG is not a body with
legal powers, it should be more open to dialog and to collaboration with the
National Conferences of Men and Women Religious. It must look for simple means
of furthering contacts.
5.
Promoting theological reflection on the consecrated life. There is a need for a regular
Theological Team which, on a permanent basis, would assist reflection on the
consecrated life, in the light of the challenges of today’s world. This is a service the USG is called on to provide.
6.
Strengthening and redefining the service of the USG Secretariat. In the light of the experiences of
those who have been the Union’s Secretaries
and of their colleagues, it is necessary to reorganize the Secretariat so that
it can be an instrument that provides swifter, more efficient and more
wide-ranging service.
7.
Other potential services. Realistic and creative examination is needed as to the possibility of
offering other services to the consecrated life.
|