|
5. The principal
investment at the present day
The moments of
history to which I have referred are different from our own and differ among
themselves. I have not recalled them to put the brake on missionary thrust or
on apostolic creativity, and still less for the purpose of re-imposing
materially the measures indicated at those periods. Our own times call more for
renewal and reorganization of life than for pauses and stoppages.
But the various
interventions highlight the need to make definite options, to establish
priorities, looking to the future as we face the permanent tensions between
what is urgent and the demands of the mission, between generosity and quality
of service. Moreover they show us that the growth of the Congregation is
something continuous in which at certain times expansion prevails, while at
other times we must look to consistency and consolidation which may cause
suffering but can also provoke enthusiasm. Finally they teach us that we must not
only administer well the resources we have inherited, but that we must also be
careful to produce them, multiply them and develop them for the future.
The situations
in the Congregation vary greatly even from the perspective we are now
considering. Some areas are expanding and others reshaping, in some the average
age of the of confreres is below 40 years and in others it is over 60; in some
zones pastoral work is complex and in others more simple; there are educative
contexts very much institutionalized and dictated from outside, and others in
which we can work with greater freedom for initiatives; there are provinces
with formation communities and qualified teams of confreres, and others taking
only the first steps in some of these sectors. For all of them the maximum
exploitation of human resources is an obligation!
The salesian
mission, as we have already noted, is everywhere entering new geographical and
cultural frontiers, and this movement will continue in the immediate future.
Indeed the worldwide dimension, urgent pastoral needs, the possibility of an
influential presence on a broad scale will still determine our way of working.
A wise overall vision enables provision to be made for local requirements,
while at the same time giving consideration to the contribution to be given to
initiatives which extend beyond provincial horizons and express the salesian
mission at regional, national and international level.
For all these
reasons the qualification of people, the consolidation of centres and teams, the
fostering of a certain cultural sensitivity in the Province, cannot be the
result of brief periods, restricted by the deadline of the end of a six-year
period or by limited calculations. Continued governmental action and
long-term vision are indispensable. A province that launches a plan for the
qualification of its personnel knows already that it will reap the benefits in
due time. But it would be sad to lose the "capital" of qualifications
thus acquired with sacrifice through failing to exploit the investment
previously made or to let it lapse.
While the
program for the present six-year period was being drawn up, the General Council
wondered how to set up an action at Congregational level so that it would be a
real priority investment in formation; how to shape a process for recovering
the value of our religious consecration in the educative mission and make us
bearers of a lived and communicated spirituality; how to enable ourselves to
offer an educative proposal reflecting the style and content of the preventive
system for present-day culture; how to give emphasis to the process of
education to the faith and foster a kind of communication which renders
efficacious what we proclaim in the climate of the new evangelization.
The fundamental
criterion which emerged was to strengthen the "quality" of the
Salesian, of the community and of the mission. It is a task which will have
to be taken up in convergent form by the different levels of government. On it
depend to a great extent the relationships between SDBs and lay people, the
effectiveness of religious experience, the incidence of the SDB community as an
animating nucleus. We have condensed this commitment into the expression "governare
formando", governing by formation. We are aware that governance includes
other specific aspects which cannot be neglected, but we consider that the
effort to form and qualify the confreres, and in particular those responsible
for the various sectors of activity, is the best formula for orientation and
animation because it multiplies results and creates unity.
|