Reciprocal influence between universal
and particular Churches
18. The problem of the mutual influence
between universal and particular values of the People of God arises from the
need to insert the mystery of the Church into the setting distinctive of each
region.
Vatican Council II dealt not only with the
universal Church but also with particular and local Churches, which it
presented as one of the aspects of renewal in ecclesial life (cf. LG 13;
23; 26; CD 3; 11; 15; AG 22; PC 20). In this light, a
certain process of decentralization, which necessarily has its consequences in
the relations between bishops and religious (cf. Evang. nunt. 61-64),
can have a positive significance.
Every particular Church becomes enriched by
sound human elements, characteristic of the genius and nature of each nation.
Such elements, nevertheless, are not to be regarded as indications of division,
of partìcularism or of nationalism, but as expressions of variety within
the same unity and of the fullness of that incarnation which enriches the
entire Mystical Body (cf. UR 14-17). The Church universal, in fact, is
not the sum total of particular Churches, nor is it a federation of
them (cf. Evang. nunt. 62), but it is the total and enlarged presence of
the unique universal sacrament of salvation (cf. Evang. nunt. 54). This
multiform unity, however, carries with it various concrete exigencies for
bishops and religious in the fulfillment of their duties.
a) Bishops and their priest-collaborators are responsible before all
others both for the correct discernment of the local cultural values in the
life of their Church, and of the clear perspective of universality, by reason
of their missionary role of successors to the Apostles, who were sent out into
the whole world (cf. CD 6; LG 20; 23; 24; AG 5; 38).
b) Religious, then, even if they belong to an institute of pontifical
right, should feel themselves truly a part of the "diocesan family"
(cf. CD 34) and accept the duty of necessary adaptation. They should
foster local vocations both for the diocesan clergy and for religious life.
Furthermore, they should form candidates for their congregation in such a way
that these really live according to the actual local culture. At the same time,
however they should be watchful that there be no deviation from the missionary
call inherent in the religious vocation, or from the unity and distinctive
character of each institute.
|