Requirements of pastoral mission
36. The Council affirms that "members,
too, of religious institutes, both men and women, also belong in a special
sense to the diocesan family and render valuable help to the sacred hierarchy,
and in view of the growing needs of the apostolate they can and should
constantly increase the aid they give" (CD
34).
In places where there are more than one
rite, religious, when carrying out activities on behalf of the faithful of
rites different from their own, should follow the norms regulating the
relationships between themselves and bishops of other rites (cf. Eccl.
Sanctae I, 23).
It is important that such criteria be
applied, not only in the final stages but also in determining and elaborating a
plan of action, without prejudice, however, to the role proper to the bishop of
making the decisions.
Religious priests, by virtue of the very
unity of the priesthood (cf. LG 28; CD 28; 11) and inasrnuch as
they share in the care of souls, "may be said, in a certain sense, to belong
to the diocesan clergy" (CD 34); therefore, in the field of
activity, they can and should serve to unite and coordinate religious men and
women with the local clergy and bishop.
37. Efforts should be made to renew the
bonds of fraternity and cooperation between the diocesan clergy and communities
of religious (cf. CD 35, 5). Great importance should therefore be placed
on all those means, even though simple and informal, which serve to increase
mutual trust, apostolic solidarity and fraternal harmony (cf. ES
I, 28). This will indeed serve not only to strengthen genuine awareness of
the local Church, but also to encourage each one to render and request help
joyfully, to foster the desire for cooperation, and also to love the human and
ecclesial community, in whose life each one finds himself a part, almost as if
it were the fatherland of his own vocation.
38. Major superiors will take great care not
only to have a knowledge of the talents and possibilities of their religious
but also of the apostolic needs of the dioceses where their institute is called
to work. Wherefore it is desirable that a concrete and global dialog be carried
on between the bishop and the superiors of the various institutes present in
the diocese, so that, especially in view of certain precarious situations and
the persistent vocational crisis, religious personnel can be more evenly and
fruitfully distributed.
39. Pastoral commitment for vocational
recruitment is to be considered a privileged area for cooperation between
bishops and religious (cf. PO 11; PC 24; OT 2). Such
pastoral commitment consists in a united effort on the part of the Christian
community for all vocations, in such a way that the Church is built up
according to the fullness of Christ and according to the variety of charisms of
His Spirit.
Regarding vocations, this above all else
must be kept in mind, namely that the Holy Spirit, who "breathes where He
wills" (Jn 3:8) calls the faithful to various offices and states
for the greater good of the Church. It is evident that no obstacles should be
placed in the way of such divine action; on the contrary, each one should be
enabled to respond to his calling with the greatest freedom. For that matter,
history itself can testify to the fact that the diversity of vocations, and particularly
the coexistence and collaboration of secular and religious clergy are not
detrimental to dioceses but rather enrich them with new spiritual treasures and
increase notably their apostolic vitality.
Wherefore, it is fitting that the various
initiatives be wisely coordinated under the bishops --according, that is, to
the duties proper to parents and educators, to men and women religious, to
diocesan priests and to all others who work in the pastoral field. This
commitment will have to be carried out harmoniously and with the full
dedication of each one. And the bishop himself should direct the efforts of
all, causing them to converge toward the self-same purpose, always mindful that
such efforts are basically inspired by the Holy Spirit. In consideration of
this fact, therefore, the promotion of frequent prayer initiatives is also
urgently necessary.
40. In renewing pastoral methods and
updating apostolic works, the profound upheavals which have taken place in our
modern world (cf. GS 43; 44) are to be taken seriously into
consideration. Wherefore at times it is necessary to confront situations which
are quite difficult, especially, "to help in the ministry in its various
forms in the dioceses or regions where the urgent needs of the Church or shortage
of clergy require it" (Eccl. Sanctae I, 36).
Bishops, in dialog with religious superiors
and with all who work in the pastoral sector of the diocese, should try to
discern what the Spirit wills and should study ways to provide new apostolic presences,
so as to be able to deal with the difficulties which have arisen within the
diocese. The search, however, for this renewal must not in the least lead to a
depreciation of the still actually valid forms of apostolate, which are
properly traditional, such as that of the school (cf. S. Congregation for
Catholic Education, The Catholic School, March 19, 1977), of the
missions, of effective presence in hospitals, social services, etc. All these
traditional forms, moreover, must be, without delay, suitably updated according
to the norms and guidelines of the Council and the needs of the times.
41. Apostolic innovations, which are later
to be undertaken, should be planned with careful study. On the one hand, it is
the duty of the bishops through their office not indeed to extinguish the
Spirit, but to test all things and hold fast to what is good (cf. 1 Thes
5:12 and 19-21; LG 12), in such a way however, "that the
spontaneous zeal of those who engage in this work may be safeguarded and
fostered" (AG 30); religious superiors, on their part, should
cooperate actively and dialog with the bishops in seeking solutions, in
arranging the programming of choices made, in launching experiments, even
completely new ones, always acting in view of the most urgent needs of the
Church and in conformity with the norms and directives of the Magisterium and
according to the nature of their institute.
42. The commitment to a mutual exchange of
help between bishops and superiors in appraising objectively and judging with
equity experiments already undertaken should never be disregarded. In this way,
not only evasions and frustrations but also the dangers of crises and
deviations will be avoided.
Periodically, therefore, such undertakings
should be reviewed; and if the endeavor has not been successful (cf. Evang.
nunt. 58), humility and at the same time the necessary firmness should be
exercised to correct, suspend or direct more adequately the experiment
examined.
43. Great harm is done to the faithful by
the fact that too much tolerance is granted to certain unsound initiatives or
to certain accomplished facts which are ambiguous. Consequently bishops and
superiors, in a spirit of mutual trust, in fulfillment of the obligations
incumbent upon each and in keeping with the exercise of each one's
responsibility, should see to it with the greatest concern that such errors are
forestalled and corrected with evident decisiveness and clear dispositions,
always in the spirit of charity but also with due resoluteness.
Especially in the field of liturgy there is
urgent need to remedy not a few abuses introduced under pretexts at variance
one with another. Bishops as the authentic liturgists of the local Church (cf SC
22; 41; LG 26;CD 15; cf. Part I, ch. II), and religious superiors
in what concerns their members should be vigilant and see that adequate renewal
of worship is brought about, and they should intervene early in order to
correct or remove any deviations and abuses in this sector, which is so
important and central (cf. SC 10). Religious, too, should remember that
they are obliged to abide by the laws and directives of the Holy See, as well
as the decrees of the local Ordinary, in what concerns the exercise of public
worship (cf. Eccl. Sanctae I, 26; 37; 38).
|