|
2. A presence that is poor,
free and freeing
This is the indispensable
condition for making our presence evangelical and for building a religious,
missionary fraternity. "And leaving everything, they followed him…. Go,
take nothing for your journey…". If the consecrated
life is to win back the truth about itself, its credibility, and express its
prophetic aspect, it must rediscover its "lightness", its simplicity
and freedom. Weighed down by too much "property", by too much
attention to itself, by too many things to do, more than being concerned to be
God’s, the consecrated life is "mortified", vilified,
incapable of expressing itself fully. Having, power, l’apparire in all its forms,
immerse the consecrated life in the world without giving it the opportunity to
remain distinct from it (cf. Jn 17:15-19). Yet, purified by poverty, the
consecrated life will again become mobile, free, obedience, vital, prophetic.
Unless the consecrated person is radically "expropriated", he is no
one.
1.
A fraternal presence
Our world
needs group signs and witnesses of fraternity. It is clear that a
"collective holiness" cannot be developed without individual
holiness. However, we must go beyond an "individualistic mysticism"
because "in the communion of saints the spheres of those who love mutually
penetrate one another".
The "global village"
is still but a dream, or probably a threat, because division and fragmentation
of all kinds are the reality in which we live. A sound, spiritually solid
fraternity is a cornerstone on which God builds his house, it is a prophetic
message for today’s man and woman.
In order to create
such fraternities that are meaningful and prophetic, it is necessary to:
2. Some hints for redesigning our
fraternal presence
Among the
many possible paths for redesigning our fraternal presence, I would like to
insist upon the following:
a) Take a fresh look at the relationship
between values and structures
The dynamic and
constructive tension between values and structures will be part and parcel of
our personal and community life until the day we die. There are no values
without structures, nor structures without some reference to values, and this
is logical. It is equally self-understood that for living certain values in
specific eras and times, structures must of necessity be adapted. The clearer
and stronger the values are, the more new forms are created and invented.
"The person who is sure of his values is ready to change". The
person, however, who finds his stability in structures does not manage to
understand the need for change.
Now, let us ask ourselves:
If we are to reachieve our charisms, a true interior
conversion is necessary.
b) Rethink and evangelize the service of
authority;
From the viewpoint of
the Gospels, and with our Rules and Constitutions as the starting point, there
should be no doubt of the authority’s nature as diakonia.
The Code of Canon Law is extremely clear on this
point (cf. Canons 618-619). It speaks of a "service received from
God", of "docility to the will of God", of "listening to
one’s subjects", of "respecting the human
person", of "building a fraternal community in which God is sought
above every thing", of dialogue, etc.
However, the concrete way of expressing this
authority is often quite different, and leaves much to be desired. In certain
cases it is a question of "protagonism"* and of
"political" and administrative self-centredness, which does not serve
to create communion, but generates fear, exaggerated individualism, an idea of
efficiency "no matter the cost". It is a thirst for and exercise of
authority as the world does. Authority becomes power. It would be a grave
mistake to identify one’s own self with authority structures; it would no
longer be service, but self-affirmation. In this case, even creating new groups
or new presences would certainly not improve our evangelical witness in the
area in which we live. It would simply be another institution, perhaps one that
is also efficient, but not a fraternity according to the Gospel.
Other times we seek to reconcile our spiritual
diakonia with our "protagonism". In this case too service can be a
means of self-affirmation. This ambiguity is the source of tension and inner
suffering for the one who exercises it, creates confusion in seeking it, and
causes confusion within the institute. There is also a "laissez
faire" authority, which has lost all hope. They let the Institution go on
with no one to lead or stimulate it. It is difficult to approdare a true and
fruitful revision of our presence as fraternity in today’s
world without the Gospel leadership that comes from authority.
c) Create a "holistic" project
with a plurality of composition and action
If we really want to
begin a new type of presence as fraternity, we cannot continue merely facing
structural emergencies, the most immediate needs, the needs of the institute or
the individual brother left to his own personal fulfilment (all of these are
"good" in themselves), but it is necessary to create a true fraternal
relationship between the members of an institute. If we want to be faithful to
our founding charism, we must overcome the superficiality of improvisations and
draw up a provincial community plan. This does not mean denying the Spirit room
to act by making our plans too detailed, or of paying attention to the selfish
and efficientist individualism, which are always justifiable, or of today’s
needs, reflecting adequately on the charismatic role of our institute in the
history in which we love and towards which we are headed.
It is necessary to have a well-thought out project,
one that is agreed upon, fulfilled and evaluated together, with the
contribution of the gifts of each member, without excluding the collaboration
of the laity.
A common project, yet one that admits of a plurality
of ways of fulfilling it. Within this unity each community should find,
recreate and periodically evaluate their own project, with the help of all. One
can serve the Church and the world while remaining faithful to the spirit of an
Institute both through the fraternal presence of contemplation or insertion, as
well as through an itinerant fraternity of evangelisation. This plurality
fosters and develops the charisms of the individual members, respects unity and
community, and helps us to broaden our horizons to the Kingdom of God.
d) Build a fraternity for the world.
In order to be
evangelical, a fraternity must go beyond itself. It is the place in which one
lives, grows and is formed, but to be sent into the fields of the world.
Missionary living is not only the logical consequence of a fraternity that is
led by the Spirit, but it is also the charismatic consciousness of its task:
always going beyond itself, towards those who are far off. A fraternity creates
ministries and services to the degree in which it takes an attitude of
listening and serving God and the world in which it lives. This creativity of
non-institutional ministries is more urgent than ever. If on the one hand there
is still diakonia to the Spirit in ecclesial communion, on the other hand it
must be concretized beginning from the many appeals that come from a world that
is thirsting for values. It is necessary to "ire inter gentes", to go
"among the peoples", as St. Francis would say: not above them, not at
their side, not even becoming confused with the logic of the world, not even
using the same methods of power and appearance, but according to the
"logic of the seed", establishing a true dialogue with everyone.
The task of the consecrated person, through a deep
discernment of the signs of the times and a healthy dose of kenosis,
expropriation and evangelical mobility, to achieve this multiplicity of
services and thus cooperate in the building up of the Kingdom of God. In this
diakonia of fraternity for the world, it is good to be concerned about the recipients
and methods of evangelisation, but it is even more important to rethink how to
live and incarnate the Gospel in this concrete culture, with its particular
traits. This is the ever urgent and timely problem of inculturation.
The "missionary fruits" of a fraternity in
the world will grow proportionate to its capacity for expropriation: that is,
leaving room for the Spirit that he may act as the main agent. The laws of
human effectiveness are replaced by those of divine fruitfulness, and are
therefore not able to be measured or evaluated, but are rather infinite. It is
essential not to forget this "pneumatic" perspective, animated with
hope.
|