Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library
Alexander Schmemann
Concerning women's ordination

IntraText - Concordances

(Hapax - words occurring once)


    Text
1 Text| etc., all categories whose ability adequately to express Christian 2 Text| passing intellectual and academic "fad" - like the "death 3 Text| Church is both gift and acceptance. And that she may be this, 4 Text| the Church's life and the "acquisition" by men of the Holy Spirit. 5 Text| irreversible and irreparable act which, if it becomes reality, 6 Text| categories whose ability adequately to express Christian faith 7 | after 8 | again 9 | against 10 Text| a specifically Western "agenda." This is not "pride" or " 11 Text| structure to clergy. To the alleged "inferiority" of women within 12 | alone 13 | also 14 Text| about it, and are sincerely amazed and even saddened by the 15 Text| and shaky. What is truly amazing is that, while absolutely 16 | among 17 Text| one of the human vocations analogous, even if superior, to all 18 Text| can answer. For it can be answered only by theology in the 19 | anything 20 Text| Christian faith and to be applied as such within the Church 21 Text| necessitate the elucidation of our approach, not to women and to priesthood 22 Text| contribution" or dismiss as archaic, narrow-minded and irrelevant. 23 Text| not listen once more to an argument ex traditione.... ~But to 24 Text| This is not "pride" or "arrogance." On the contrary, the Christian 25 Text| who offerest and Thou who art offered, it is Thou who 26 Text| Dear Friend: ~When you asked me to outline the Orthodox 27 Text| immediately and without even asking what the "others" may think 28 Text| any rate is a phenomenon barely at its beginning (not to 29 Text| purely Western phenomenon, based on Western presuppositions 30 Text| Holy Spirit. And if the bearer, the icon, and the fulfiller 31 Text| real power, her glory and beauty, her transcendent truth 32 | became 33 | become 34 | becomes 35 | been 36 | before 37 | begin 38 | beginning 39 Text| produced a couple of ephemeral best-sellers simply disappears, but with 40 Text| complex and enjoys nothing better than self-criticism and 41 Text| openness to God's will, blindness to the world, etc. Obviously 42 | both 43 Text| are revealed to us as a Bride, as a Woman clothed in the 44 Text| to you this amazement by briefly enumerating its main "components" 45 Text| understood" by means of our broken and fallen world which knows 46 Text| experiences itself only in its brokenness and fragmentation, in its 47 Text| priorities, our Western brothers either hail as Orthodoxy' 48 Text| beyond any doubt: the truly built-in indifference of the Christian 49 Text| us totally extrinsic, a casus irrealis for which we find 50 Text| truly universal, truly "catholic" experience. Western Christians 51 Text| of God," "secular city," "celebration of life," etc. - which, 52 Text| twelve, if the Church for centuries did not include them into 53 Text| decades of our troubled century! How many corresponding " 54 Text| justification for a radical change in the very structure of 55 Text| more honorable than the Cherubim, and beyond compare more 56 Text| self-sufficiency, by a naive, almost childish conviction that every "trend" 57 Text| creation, between God and His chosen people, between God and 58 Text| death of God," "secular city," "celebration of life," 59 Text| movement," notwithstanding its claims to the contrary, has always 60 Text| entirely dominated by the old "clerical" view of the Church and 61 Text| shaped by a surrender to "clericalism." It is indeed almost entirely 62 Text| us as a Bride, as a Woman clothed in the sun; why in the very 63 Text| the Cherubim, and beyond compare more glorious than the Seraphim." ~ 64 Text| almost obsessed with a guilt complex and enjoys nothing better 65 Text| briefly enumerating its main "components" as I see and understand 66 Text| ecumenical spirit, sympathy and comprehension. ~Personally I have often 67 Text| ineffable mystery of her life by concepts and ideas a priory alien 68 Text| escape us. ~This is why in concluding this letter I can only confess, 69 Text| enthusiastically judge and condemn themselves Ñ but on their 70 Text| concluding this letter I can only confess, without explaining and 71 Text| explaining and justifying this confession by any "proofs," that the 72 Text| long time but which now is confirmed beyond any doubt: the truly 73 Text| is the result of too many confusions and reductions. If its root 74 Text| will sound like another "conservative" and "traditional" defense 75 Text| essential reality which alone constitutes he content of our faith 76 Text| deification of man and the consummation of all things in Christ. 77 Text| the world themselves, when contemplated in their ultimate truth 78 Text| word in the Church, as the contemplation and vision of the Truth 79 Text| which alone constitutes he content of our faith and shapes 80 Text| reducing it to a theological context and perspective alien to 81 Text| Orthodoxy's "main ecumenical contribution" or dismiss as archaic, 82 Text| all I can do is to try to convey to you this amazement by 83 Text| a naive, almost childish conviction that every "trend" in Western 84 Text| secular society must therefore correspond their "liberation," i.e., 85 Text| troubled century! How many corresponding "theologies"! The difference 86 Text| secular power structure corresponds their "inferiority," i.e., 87 Text| after it has produced a couple of ephemeral best-sellers 88 Text| woman.... ~Why? This of course is the only important, the 89 Text| Personally I have often enough criticized the historical limitations 90 Text| that they understand past "cultures," the advocates of women' 91 Text| depending on their mood and current priorities, our Western 92 Text| historical, and cultural? ~ÐAlexander Schmemann ~ ~ ~ 93 Text| time however is that one deals in this particular debate 94 Text| an issue of policy to be dealt with by vote! In this strange 95 Text| Dear Friend: ~When you asked 96 Text| academic "fad" - like the "death of God," "secular city," " 97 Text| witnessed during the last decades of our troubled century! 98 Text| perspective. Thus when they decide Ñ on the basis of their 99 Text| seems to be provincial, deeply marked and even determined 100 Text| conservative" and "traditional" defense of the status quo, of precisely 101 Text| ecclesiological stand which, depending on their mood and current 102 Text| the sun; why in the very depth of her love and knowledge, 103 Text| their ultimate truth and destiny, are revealed to us as a 104 Text| culture," its pattern of development is shaped by a surrender 105 Text| fragmentation, in its tensions and dichotomies, and which as such is incapable 106 Text| corresponding "theologies"! The difference this time however is that 107 Text| prepared. ~Such then is my difficulty. I cannot discuss the problem 108 Text| understand them. ~The first dimension of our amazement can be 109 Text| ephemeral best-sellers simply disappears, but with the threat of 110 Text| reduced to the level of a "disciplinary matter," and finally identified 111 Text| ordination as it is present and discussed today is the result of too 112 Text| the Church, and for the discussion of which we are therefore 113 Text| ecumenical contribution" or dismiss as archaic, narrow-minded 114 Text| men and women, without any distinction - are "kings and priests," 115 Text| who receivest and Thou who distributest .... "And thus the "institutional" 116 Text| time I am convinced final, division among Christians, will signify, 117 Text| as fully as possible the dogmatical, canonical, and spiritual 118 Text| is indeed almost entirely dominated by the old "clerical" view 119 Text| view of the Church and the double "reduction" inherent in 120 Text| is confirmed beyond any doubt: the truly built-in indifference 121 | during 122 Text| from the clergy, within the ecclesiastical power structure. To their " 123 Text| as is also our general ecclesiological stand which, depending on 124 | either 125 Text| so would necessitate the elucidation of our approach, not to 126 Text| right" to it, but it is emphatically not one of the human vocations 127 Text| with a guilt complex and enjoys nothing better than self-criticism 128 Text| Western Christians almost enthusiastically judge and condemn themselves 129 Text| clericalism." It is indeed almost entirely dominated by the old "clerical" 130 Text| women's priesthood, and to enumerate as fully as possible the 131 Text| this amazement by briefly enumerating its main "components" as 132 Text| has produced a couple of ephemeral best-sellers simply disappears, 133 Text| of "rights," "justice," "equality," etc., all categories whose 134 Text| transcendent truth simply escape us. ~This is why in concluding 135 Text| priory alien to her very essence, we literally mutilate her, 136 Text| between God and His Church is "essentially" revealed to us as a nuptial 137 Text| that it may need to be evaluated and judged in the light 138 | every 139 | everywhere 140 Text| once more to an argument ex traditione.... ~But to what 141 Text| with one Woman whom she exalts as "more honorable than 142 Text| history," and even no "exegesis" can answer. For it can 143 Text| here the theological and exegetical implications of this view 144 Text| ontology" of its own. It exists only to make Christ Himself 145 Text| fallen world which knows and experiences itself only in its brokenness 146 Text| is nothing but search and experimentation), as a sufficient justification 147 Text| can only confess, without explaining and justifying this confession 148 Text| whose ability adequately to express Christian faith and to be 149 Text| incidentally, seems to me extremely weak and shaky. What is 150 Text| question; it is for us totally extrinsic, a casus irrealis for which 151 Text| Orthodox Church has never faced this question; it is for 152 Text| intellectual and academic "fad" - like the "death of God," " 153 Text| Triune Life, to Creation, Fall and Redemption, to the Church 154 Text| means of our broken and fallen world which knows and experiences 155 Text| truly "neither male nor female." More than that, in this 156 Text| this time I am convinced final, division among Christians, 157 Text| disciplinary matter," and finally identified as an issue of 158 Text| casus irrealis for which we find no basis, no terms of reference 159 Text| another" sacrifice. It is forever and only Christ's priesthood 160 Text| foundation, indeed the very "form" of the Church. This priesthood 161 Text| Useless because all such "formal" reasons - scriptural, traditional, 162 Text| irrelevant. Harmful because, true formally, this answer would still 163 Text| experience, problems, thought forms and priorities may not be 164 Text| unique priesthood the very foundation, indeed the very "form" 165 Text| only in its brokenness and fragmentation, in its tensions and dichotomies, 166 Text| own, possibly limited and fragmented, specifically Western "cultural 167 Text| Dear Friend: ~When you asked me to outline 168 Text| bearer, the icon, and the fulfiller of that unique priesthood 169 Text| nuptial mystery, as the fulfillment of a mystical marriage; 170 Text| priesthood, and to enumerate as fully as possible the dogmatical, 171 Text| of the Church? How else, furthermore, are we to explain that 172 Text| ordination, as is also our general ecclesiological stand which, 173 Text| and beyond compare more glorious than the Seraphim." ~Is 174 Text| and her real power, her glory and beauty, her transcendent 175 Text| is almost obsessed with a guilt complex and enjoys nothing 176 Text| Western brothers either hail as Orthodoxy's "main ecumenical 177 Text| and to us incomprehensible hastiness with which the question 178 Text| which many Christians today, having heard it too many times, 179 Text| Christians today, having heard it too many times, reject 180 Text| culture," no "sociology," no "history," and even no "exegesis" 181 Text| acquisition" by men of the Holy Spirit. And if the bearer, 182 Text| whom she exalts as "more honorable than the Cherubim, and beyond 183 Text| terms, within their own hopelessly "Western" perspective. Thus 184 Text| too many times, reject as hypocrisy, lack of openness to God' 185 Text| And if the bearer, the icon, and the fulfiller of that 186 Text| her life by concepts and ideas a priory alien to her very 187 Text| disciplinary matter," and finally identified as an issue of policy to 188 Text| and communion, the Church identifies herself with one Woman whom 189 Text| inferiority" we can invent or imagine. In the essential reality 190 Text| women, they plan to do it immediately and without even asking 191 Text| theological and exegetical implications of this view as well as 192 Text| This of course is the only important, the only relevant question, 193 Text| which would have made it impossible and unthinkable then. It 194 Text| is plagued with a total inability to transcend itself, to 195 Text| dichotomies, and which as such is incapable of the ultimate vision? 196 Text| historical basis which, incidentally, seems to me extremely weak 197 Text| doubt: the truly built-in indifference of the Christian West to 198 Text| and the double "reduction" inherent in it: the reduction on 199 Text| that they must "repair" injustices made to women, they plan 200 Text| distributest .... "And thus the "institutional" priesthood in the Church 201 Text| debate not with a passing intellectual and academic "fad" - like 202 Text| whatever "inferiority" we can invent or imagine. In the essential 203 Text| totally extrinsic, a casus irrealis for which we find no basis, 204 Text| archaic, narrow-minded and irrelevant. Harmful because, true formally, 205 Text| but with the threat of an irreversible and irreparable act which, 206 Text| love and knowledge, of her joy and communion, the Church 207 Text| almost enthusiastically judge and condemn themselves Ñ 208 Text| need to be evaluated and judged in the light of a truly 209 Text| perspective of "rights," "justice," "equality," etc., all 210 Text| experimentation), as a sufficient justification for a radical change in 211 Text| trend" in Western culture justifies a radical rethinking of 212 Text| without explaining and justifying this confession by any " 213 Text| Church, in the reality of the Kingdom of God which is perfect 214 Text| without any distinction - are "kings and priests," for it is 215 Text| broken and fallen world which knows and experiences itself only 216 | last 217 Text| is why in concluding this letter I can only confess, without 218 Text| then quickly reduced to the level of a "disciplinary matter," 219 Text| basis of their own, possibly limited and fragmented, specifically 220 Text| to her very essence, we literally mutilate her, and her real 221 Text| there is truly "neither male nor female." More than that, 222 Text| to be provincial, deeply marked and even determined by Western 223 Text| fulfillment of a mystical marriage; why, in other terms, creation 224 Text| level of a "disciplinary matter," and finally identified 225 Text| primordial and essential meaning of that word in the Church, 226 Text| limitations of the Orthodox mentality not to have the right to 227 | might 228 Text| perspective alien to the Orthodox mind. For the Orthodox Church 229 Text| exclusion of women from the ministry by cultural "conditioning." 230 Text| which, depending on their mood and current priorities, 231 Text| very essence, we literally mutilate her, and her real power, 232 Text| radical and irreparable mutilation of the entire faith, the 233 Text| as the fulfillment of a mystical marriage; why, in other 234 Text| and self-sufficiency, by a naive, almost childish conviction 235 Text| or dismiss as archaic, narrow-minded and irrelevant. Harmful 236 Text| priesthood of the human nature and vocation that the Christ 237 Text| itself because to do so would necessitate the elucidation of our approach, 238 Text| be universal, that it may need to be evaluated and judged 239 Text| the whole Scripture - and needless to say, the end of all " 240 | neither 241 | never 242 Text| reality, will produce a new, and this time I am convinced 243 Text| by any "proofs," that the non-ordination of women to the priesthood 244 | none 245 | nor 246 Text| so-called "ecumenical movement," notwithstanding its claims to the contrary, 247 Text| essentially" revealed to us as a nuptial mystery, as the fulfillment 248 Text| Christian West is almost obsessed with a guilt complex and 249 Text| blindness to the world, etc. Obviously enough, those who reject 250 Text| Offertory, "it is Thou who offerest and Thou who art offered, 251 Text| priest, and the sacrifice he offers is not "another" sacrifice. 252 Text| the words of our Prayer of Offertory, "it is Thou who offerest 253 | often 254 Text| entirely dominated by the old "clerical" view of the Church 255 | once 256 Text| priesthood in the Church has no "ontology" of its own. It exists only 257 Text| reject as hypocrisy, lack of openness to God's will, blindness 258 Text| hand of the Church to a Òpower structure"; the reduction 259 Text| spiritual reasons for that opposition. At a second thought, however, 260 Text| brothers either hail as Orthodoxy's "main ecumenical contribution" 261 | ours 262 Text| Friend: ~When you asked me to outline the Orthodox reaction to 263 | over 264 Text| saddened by the lack, on the part of these "others," of ecumenical 265 Text| reality of which we are made partakers here and now, we all - men 266 Text| is that one deals in this particular debate not with a passing 267 Text| convinced that they understand past "cultures," the advocates 268 Text| surrender to "culture," its pattern of development is shaped 269 Text| between God and His chosen people, between God and His Church 270 Text| sympathy and comprehension. ~Personally I have often enough criticized 271 Text| self-condemnation. It is plagued with a total inability to 272 Text| injustices made to women, they plan to do it immediately and 273 Text| the world, the starting point and the very possibility 274 Text| identified as an issue of policy to be dealt with by vote! 275 Text| vitiate the real Orthodox position by reducing it to a theological 276 Text| starting point and the very possibility of a truly divine victory 277 Text| to enumerate as fully as possible the dogmatical, canonical, 278 Text| the basis of their own, possibly limited and fragmented, 279 Text| for in the words of our Prayer of Offertory, "it is Thou 280 Text| are therefore simply not prepared. ~Such then is my difficulty. 281 Text| phenomenon, based on Western presuppositions and determined by a specifically 282 Text| Western "agenda." This is not "pride" or "arrogance." On the 283 Text| restored to us. ~It is of this priestly life, it is of this ultimate 284 Text| distinction - are "kings and priests," for it is essential priesthood 285 Text| only by theology in the primordial and essential meaning of 286 Text| by concepts and ideas a priory alien to her very essence, 287 Text| difficulty. I cannot discuss the problem itself because to do so 288 Text| beyond the sphere of its own problematics, of its own experience. 289 Text| that its own experience, problems, thought forms and priorities 290 Text| it becomes reality, will produce a new, and this time I am 291 Text| etc. - which, after it has produced a couple of ephemeral best-sellers 292 Text| this confession by any "proofs," that the non-ordination 293 Text| readiness to accept what may prove to be a passing phenomenon, 294 Text| s ordination seems to be provincial, deeply marked and even 295 Text| It is only here, in this purified and restored vision, that 296 Text| unthinkable then. It is not my purpose to discuss here the theological 297 Text| Church is, to say the least, questionable? ~The sad truth is that 298 Text| accepted as an issue, then quickly reduced to the level of 299 Text| traditional" defense of the status quo, of precisely that which 300 Text| phenomenon, and what at any rate is a phenomenon barely at 301 Text| else can one explain their readiness to accept what may prove 302 Text| offered, it is Thou who receivest and Thou who distributest .... " 303 Text| Life, to Creation, Fall and Redemption, to the Church and the mystery 304 Text| real Orthodox position by reducing it to a theological context 305 Text| too many confusions and reductions. If its root is surrender 306 Text| find no basis, no terms of reference in our Tradition, in the 307 Text| of the entire faith, the rejection of the whole Scripture - 308 Text| ineffable mystery of the relationship between God and His creation, 309 Text| only important, the only relevant question, the one that no " 310 Text| Short of all this, it would remain incomprehensible, I am sure, 311 Text| situation" Ñ that they must "repair" injustices made to women, 312 Text| own experience. I can only repeat here what I have said before: 313 Text| and discussed today is the result of too many confusions and 314 Text| culture justifies a radical rethinking of the entire Christian 315 Text| debate on women's ordination reveals something which we suspected 316 Text| within the perspective of "rights," "justice," "equality," 317 Text| confusions and reductions. If its root is surrender to "culture," 318 Text| least, questionable? ~The sad truth is that the very idea 319 Text| sincerely amazed and even saddened by the lack, on the part 320 Text| repeat here what I have said before: even the so-called " 321 Text| and cultural? ~ÐAlexander Schmemann ~ ~ ~ 322 Text| the rejection of the whole Scripture - and needless to say, the 323 Text| at present is nothing but search and experimentation), as 324 Text| for that opposition. At a second thought, however, I became 325 Text| its main "components" as I see and understand them. ~The 326 | seem 327 Text| even determined by Western self-centeredness and self-sufficiency, by 328 Text| than self-criticism and self-condemnation. It is plagued with a total 329 Text| enjoys nothing better than self-criticism and self-condemnation. It 330 Text| Western self-centeredness and self-sufficiency, by a naive, almost childish 331 Text| compare more glorious than the Seraphim." ~Is it this mystery that 332 Text| to me extremely weak and shaky. What is truly amazing is 333 Text| pattern of development is shaped by a surrender to "clericalism." 334 Text| content of our faith and shapes the entire life of the Church, 335 Text| division among Christians, will signify, at least for the Orthodox, 336 Text| transcend itself, to accept the simple idea that its own experience, 337 Text| think about it, and are sincerely amazed and even saddened 338 Text| the right to say in all sincerity that to me the debate on 339 Text| have said before: even the so-called "ecumenical movement," notwithstanding 340 Text| liberation" in the secular society must therefore correspond 341 Text| one that no "culture," no "sociology," no "history," and even 342 | something 343 Text| measure or limitations, the Son of God offered Himself in 344 Text| all this, my answer will sound like another "conservative" 345 Text| His unique Sacrifice the source of the Church's life and 346 Text| at its beginning (not to speak of the womenÕs liberation 347 Text| West to anything beyond the sphere of its own problematics, 348 Text| dogmatical, canonical, and spiritual reasons for that opposition. 349 Text| general ecclesiological stand which, depending on their 350 Text| understanding of the world, the starting point and the very possibility 351 Text| difficult indeed simply to state that the Orthodox Church 352 Text| traditional" defense of the status quo, of precisely that which 353 Text| and experimentation), as a sufficient justification for a radical 354 Text| as a Woman clothed in the sun; why in the very depth of 355 Text| vocations analogous, even if superior, to all others. The priest 356 Text| remain incomprehensible, I am sure, why the ordination of women 357 Text| reveals something which we suspected for a long time but which 358 Text| of ecumenical spirit, sympathy and comprehension. ~Personally 359 Text| to priesthood for us is tantamount to a radical and irreparable 360 Text| and fragmentation, in its tensions and dichotomies, and which 361 Text| of our amazement can be termed "ecumenical." The debate 362 Text| How many corresponding "theologies"! The difference this time 363 Text| can be answered only by theology in the primordial and essential 364 | there 365 Text| the consummation of all things in Christ. Short of all 366 Text| asking what the "others" may think about it, and are sincerely 367 | those 368 Text| disappears, but with the threat of an irreversible and irreparable 369 Text| having heard it too many times, reject as hypocrisy, lack 370 Text| self-condemnation. It is plagued with a total inability to transcend itself, 371 Text| once more to an argument ex traditione.... ~But to what will they 372 Text| with a total inability to transcend itself, to accept the simple 373 Text| her glory and beauty, her transcendent truth simply escape us. ~ 374 Text| childish conviction that every "trend" in Western culture justifies 375 Text| Tradition. How many such "trends" we have witnessed during 376 Text| above all to God in His Triune Life, to Creation, Fall 377 Text| the last decades of our troubled century! How many corresponding " 378 Text| irrelevant. Harmful because, true formally, this answer would 379 Text| not include women into the twelve, if the Church for centuries 380 Text| knowledge, perfect love and ultimately the "deification" of man, 381 Text| ordination seem to be so totally unaware of their own cultural "conditioning," 382 Text| itself, as communion with the uncreated Divine Light. It is only 383 Text| for us the "means" of our understanding of the world, the starting 384 Text| mystery that has to be "understood" by means of our broken 385 Text| have made it impossible and unthinkable then. It is not my purpose 386 Text| possibility of a truly divine victory over all that in this world 387 Text| this answer would still vitiate the real Orthodox position 388 Text| of the human nature and vocation that the Christ has restored 389 Text| emphatically not one of the human vocations analogous, even if superior, 390 Text| policy to be dealt with by vote! In this strange situation 391 | was 392 Text| incidentally, seems to me extremely weak and shaky. What is truly 393 | whatever 394 | while 395 | whole 396 | whom 397 | whose 398 Text| many such "trends" we have witnessed during the last decades 399 Text| beginning (not to speak of the womenÕs liberation movement which 400 Text| essential meaning of that word in the Church, as the contemplation 401 Text| s sacrifice, for in the words of our Prayer of Offertory, "


Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (V89) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2007. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License