Dives in misericordia
   Chap., §
 1   4,    5|         justice. Precisely this reasoning demonstrates that, at the


Fides et ratio
   Chap., §
 2   2,  19 |         author affirms that, in reasoning about nature, the human
 3   2,  20 |      overvalued. The results of reasoning may in fact be true, but
 4   2,  22 |       became “empty”, and human reasoning became distorted and inclined
 5   3,  31 |      life or by dint of further reasoning. Nonetheless, there are
 6   3,  34 |    fundamental premise of human reasoning, as the principle of non-contradiction
 7   4,  42 |         satisfied if, by way of reasoning, he reaches a quite certain
 8   4,  42 | established on the basis of due reasoning, then the foundation of
 9   4,  48 |        that faith, tied to weak reasoning, might be more penetrating;
10   7,  97 |  between faith and metaphysical reasoning.~


Redemptoris Mater
   Chap., §
11   2,  33 | knowledge inaccessible to human reasoning and who attained through