Centesimus annus
Chap., §
1 1, 4 | property had appeared — capital; and a new form of labour —
2 1, 5 | was the conflict between capital and labour, or — as the
3 1, 6 | which had arisen between capital and labour, Pope Leo XIII
4 4, 32 | was the land, and later capital — understood as a total
5 4, 35 | absolute predominance of capital, the possession of the means
6 4, 43 | considered only as a "society of capital goods"; it is also a "society
7 4, 43 | they supply the necessary capital for the company's activities
Laborem exercens
Chap., §
8 2, 7| is the possessor of the capital, that is to say, of all
9 2, 8| initiative by the possessors of capital alone, but did not pay sufficient
10 2, 8| of production, and that capital is the basis, efficient
11 3 | CONFLICT BETWEEN LABOUR AND CAPITAL IN THE PRESENT PHASE OF
12 3, 11| development emerged between "capital" and "labour", that is to
13 3, 11| conflict between labour and capital was transformed into a systematic
14 3, 12| priority of labour over capital. This principle directly
15 3, 12| primary efficient cause, while capital, the whole collection of
16 3, 12| grown accustomed to calling capital. Since the concept of capital
17 3, 12| capital. Since the concept of capital includes not only the natural
18 3, 12| considered synonymous with "capital" - is the result of work
19 3, 12| contained in the concept of capital in the strict sense is only
20 3, 13| clearly, first of all, that capital cannot be separated from
21 3, 13| can labour be opposed to capital or capital to labour, and
22 3, 13| be opposed to capital or capital to labour, and still less
23 3, 13| opposition between labour and capital through an effort at being
24 3, 13| Opposition between labour and capital does not spring from the
25 3, 13| we are accustomed to call capital are intermingled; it shows
26 3, 13| things", the instruments, the capital, is that it conditions man'
27 3, 13| labour was separated from capital and set in opposition to
28 3, 13| in opposition to it, and capital was set in opposition to
29 3, 13| separation of labour and capital and for setting them up
30 3, 13| primacy of man over the capital instrument, the primacy
31 3, 13| antinomy between labour and capital under consideration here -
32 3, 13| labour was separated from capital and set up in opposition
33 3, 13| and of human labour over capital as a whole collection of
34 3, 14| opposition between labour and capital, we are not dealing only
35 3, 14| set it up in the form of "capital" in opposition to "labour"-
36 3, 14| practice. If it is true that capital, as the whole of the means
37 3, 14| it is equally true that capital is being unceasingly created
38 3, 14| these means of production (capital) out of the hands of their
39 3, 14| labour with the ownership of capital, as far as possible, and
40 3, 15| priority of labour over capital is a postulate of the order
41 3, 15| a sense inseparable from capital; in no way does it accept
42 4, 19| relationships within it between capital and labour, wages, that
43 4, 20| final analysis, labour and capital are indispensable components
44 4, 23| work itself require that capital should be at the service
45 4, 23| labour at the service of capital.~
Slavorum apostoli
Chap., §
46 4, 12 | those Churches, both in the capital and in the course of his
Sollicitudo rei socialis
Chap., §
47 2, 10 | hinder the direct transfer of capital set aside for helping needy
48 3, 19 | of abundantly available capital was the hope of being able
49 3, 19 | Thus the availability of capital and the fact of accepting
50 3, 19 | themselves obliged to export the capital needed for improving or
51 3, 24 | that in certain cases the capital lent by the developed world
|