2. In the Organic Development of the Church's Social Action
It is
certainly true that work, as a human issue, is at the very centre of the
"social question" to which, for almost a hundred years, since the
publication of the above-mentioned Encyclical, the Church's teaching and the
many undertakings connected with her apostolic mission have been especially
directed. The present reflections on work are not intended to follow a
different line, but rather to be in organic connection with the whole tradition
of this teaching and activity. At the same time, however, I am making them,
according to the indication in the Gospel, in order to bring out from the
heritage of the Gospel "what is new and what is old"7. Certainly, work is part of "what is old"- as
old as man and his life on earth. Nevertheless, the general situation of man in
the modern world, studied and analyzed in its various aspects of geography,
culture and civilization, calls for the discovery of the new meanings of
human work. It likewise calls for the formulation of the new tasks that
in this sector face each individual, the family, each country, the whole human
race, and, finally, the Church herself.
During
the years that separate us from the publication of the Encyclical Rerum Novarum, the
social question has not ceased to engage the Church's attention. Evidence of
this are the many documents of the Magisterium issued
by the Popes and by the Second Vatican Council, pronouncements by individual
Episcopates, and the activity of the various centres of thought and of
practical apostolic initiatives, both on the international level and at the
level of the local Churches. It is difficult to list here in detail all the
manifestations of the commitment of the Church and of Christians in the social
question, for they are too numerous. As a result of the Council, the main
coordinating centre in this field is the Pontifical Commission Justice and
Peace, which has corresponding bodies within the individual Bishops' Conferences.
The name of this institution is very significant. It indicates that the social
question must be dealt with in its whole complex dimension. Commitment to
justice must be closely linked with commitment to peace in the modern world.
This twofold commitment is certainly supported by the painful experience of the
two great world wars which in the course of the last ninety years have
convulsed many European countries and, at least partially, countries in other
continents. It is supported, especially since the Second World War, by the
permanent threat of a nuclear war and the prospect of the terrible
self-destruction that emerges from it.
If we
follow the main line of development of the documents of the supreme Magisterium of the Church, we find in them an explicit
confirmation of precisely such a statement of the question. The key position,
as regards the question of world peace, is that of John XXIII's
Encyclical Pacem in Terris.
However, if one studies the development of the question of social justice, one
cannot fail to note that, whereas during the period between Rerum
Novarum and Pius XI's Quadragesimo
Anno the Church's teaching concentrates mainly on
the just solution of the "labour question" within individual nations,
in the next period the Church's teaching widens its horizon to take in the
whole world. The disproportionate distribution of wealth and poverty and the
existence of some countries and continents that are developed and of others
that are not call for a levelling out and for a search for ways to ensure just
development for all. This is the direction of the teaching in John XXIII's Encyclical Mater et Magistra, in the Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes of
the Second Vatican Council, and in Paul VI's
Encyclical Populorum Progressio.
This trend
of development of the Church's teaching and commitment in the social question
exactly corresponds to the objective recognition of the state of affairs. While
in the past the "class" question was especially highlighted as
the centre of this issue, in more recent times it is the "world"
question that is emphasized. Thus, not only the sphere of class is taken
into consideration but also the world sphere of inequality and injustice, and
as a consequence, not only the class dimension but also the world dimension of
the tasks involved in the path towards the achievement of justice in the modern
world. A complete analysis of the situation of the world today shows in an even
deeper and fuller way the meaning of the previous analysis of social
injustices; and it is the meaning that must be given today to efforts to build
justice on earth, not concealing thereby unjust structures but demanding that
they be examined and transformed on a more universal scale.
|