7.
A Threat to the Right Order of Values
It is
precisely these fundamental affirmations about work that always emerged from
the wealth of Christian truth, especially from the very message of the
"Gospel of work", thus creating the basis for a new way of thinking,
judging and acting. In the modern period, from the beginning of the industrial
age, the Christian truth about work had to oppose the various trends of materialistic
and economistic thought.
For
certain supporters of such ideas, work was understood and treated as a sort of
"merchandise" that the worker - especially the industrial worker -
sells to the employer, who at the same time is the possessor of the capital,
that is to say, of all the working tools and means that make production
possible. This way of looking at work was widespread especially in the first
half of the nineteenth century. Since then, explicit expressions of this sort have
almost disappeared, and have given way to more human ways of thinking about
work and evaluating it. The interaction between the worker and the tools and
means of production has given rise to the development of various forms of
capitalism - parallel with various forms of collectivism - into which other
socioeconomic elements have entered as a consequence of new concrete
circumstances, of the activity of workers' associations and public autorities, and of the emergence of large transnational enterprises. Nevertheless, the danger of
treating work as a special kind of "merchandise", or as an impersonal
"force" needed for production (the expression "workforce"
is in fact in common use) always exists, especially when the whole way
of looking at the question of economics is marked by the premises of
materialistic economism.
A
systematic opportunity for thinking and evaluating in this way, and in a
certain sense a stimulus for doing so, is provided by the quickening process of
the development of a onesidedly materialistic
civilization, which gives prime importance to the objective dimension of work,
while the subjective dimension - everything in direct or indirect relationship
with the subject of work - remains on a secondary level. In all cases of this
sort, in every social situation of this type, there is a confusion or even a
reversal of the order laid down from the beginning by the words of the Book of
Genesis: man is treated as an instrument of production12, whereas he - he alone,
independently of the work he does - ought to be treated as the effective
subject of work and its true maker and creator. Precisely this reversal of
order, whatever the programme or name under which it occurs, should rightly be
called "capitalism" - in the sense more fully explained below.
Everybody knows that capitalism has a definite historical meaning as a system,
an economic and social system, opposed to "socialism" or
"communism". But in the light of the analysis of the fundamental
reality of the whole economic process - first and foremost of the production
structure that work is - it should be recognized that the error of early
capitalism can be repeated wherever man is in a way treated on the same level
as the whole complex of the material means of production, as an instrument and
not in accordance with the true dignity of his work - that is to say, where he
is not treated as subject and maker, and for this very reason as the true
purpose of the whole process of production.
This
explains why the analysis of human work in the light of the words concerning
man's "dominion" over the earth goes to the very heart of the ethical
and social question. This concept should also find a central place in
the whole sphere of social and economic policy, both within individual
countries and in the wider field of international and intercontinental
relationships, particularly with reference to the tensions making themselves felt in the world not only between East and West
but also between North and South. Both John XXIII in the Encyclical Mater et Magistra and Paul VI in the
Encyclical Populorum Progressio
gave special attention to these dimensions of the modern ethical and social
question.
|