2. In
order to apply these principles to reality, their objective significance must
be borne in mind, together with the specific nature of the Apostolic See. This
latter does not have the general form of true states even though, as I noted
above, the entity described as the Vatican City State is closely linked with
it; for true states are subjects of the political sovereignty of particular
societies. On the other hand, the Vatican City State is sovereign, yet does not
possess all ordinary characteristics of a political community. It is an
atypical state. It exists as a fitting means of guaranteeing the exercise of
the spiritual liberty of the Apostolic See; that is, as the means of assuring
real and visible independence of the same in its activity of government for the
sake of the universal Church, as well as of its pastoral work directed toward
the whole human race. It does not possess a proper society for the service of
which it was established nor does it base itself upon forms of social action
which usually determine the structure and organization of every other state.
Furthermore, the persons who aid the Apostolic See or even cooperate in
government of the Vatican City State are with few exceptions not citizens of
this state. Nor, consequently, do they have the rights and duties (those to do
with taxation in particular) which ordinarily arise from belonging to a state.
The Apostolic See does not develop nor can it develop economic activity
proper to a state, since it transcends the narrow confines of the Vatican City
State in a much more important respect and extends its mission to the whole of
the earth. Production of economic goods and enrichment by way of revenues are
foreign to its institutional purposes. Besides the revenues of the Vatican City
State and the limited income afforded by what remains of the funds obtained on
the occasion of the Lateran Pacts as indemnity for the Papal States. and
ecclesiastical goods passed to the Italian State, the prime basis of sustenance
of the Apostolic See is the spontaneous offerings provided by Catholics
throughout the world and by other men of good will. This corresponds to a
tradition having its origin in the Gospel and the teachings of the apostles.
This tradition has taken on various forms over the centuries in relation to the
economic structures prevailing in various eras. In conformity with that
tradition it must be affirmed that the Apostolic See may and ought to make use
of the spontaneous contributions of the faithful and other people of good will,
without having recourse to other means which might appear to be less respectful
of the character proper to the Apostolic See.
|