Chapter

 1 10|  declaration in the decrees of his synod: "We do not purpose by this
 2 16|     confirmation of the provincial synod of the Ruthenians which
 3 16| suggestions of the fathers of this synod should be approved, although
 4 16|         practice. He confirmed the synod in his apostolic brief in
 5 16|           Our confirmation of this synod should not be thought to
 6 23|           affirmed at the national synod held at Mt. Libanus in 1736
 7 24|            Canon 7 of the Maronite Synod gathered at Mt. Lebanon
 8 24|        reason." The fathers of the synod of Zamoscia in 1720 agree
 9 24|           de Eucharistia). And the Synod of Lebanon confirmed it
10 25|        486f). ~~The fathers at the Synod of Lebanon, 1736, passed
11 26|           Still the fathers of the Synod of Zamoscia in 1720 forbade
12 26|          For a serious reason, the synod forbids and abolishes the
13 29|         Pope Felix III and a Roman synod, Lupus continues: "They
14 29|          3f. It was decreed at the Synod of Zamoscia, which was studied
15 29|   Eucharistia). The fathers of the synod of Lebanon, which We confirmed,
16 30|            both the fathers of the synod of Zamoscia (heading 1,
17 30|   Catholica and the fathers of the synod of Lebanon (pt. 1, no. 12)
18 31|      prescribed in the Latin rite (Synod of Lebanon 1736, chap. 12,
19 31|             346f). Recently at the synod of Lebanon (chap. 13), unanimously
20 46|        statement of the provincial synod of the Maronites in 1736