Chapter

 1 23|      law of Can. de Ligur. 23, quest. 5, and Can. Nulli, 5, dist.
 2 23|       part. D. Thomae, vol. 4, quest. 83, art. 1, qu. 9. ~Here
 3 23| himself in 4. Sent., dist. 18, quest. 2, art. 1, in answer to
 4 27|      in 4. Sentent., dist. 12, quest. 2, art. 2, quest. 2, to
 5 27|    dist. 12, quest. 2, art. 2, quest. 2, to the fourth). Therefore,
 6 37|    nothing" (Summa Theol. 2.2, quest. 84, art. 82, answer to
 7 37|  Thomas too (Summa Theol. 2.2, quest. 85, art. 2). So we read
 8 37|     part. Divi Thomae, vol. 1, quest. 25, art. 2, disput. 61,
 9 56|       Can. Manus impositio, 1, quest. 1, also gives a careful
10 56|     part. Divi Thomae, vol. 3, quest. 72, disp. 34, sect. 1,
11 62|        St. Thomas (Summa 1, 2, quest. 103, art. 4, to 3rd). Moreover
12 74|       of the Summa, disp. 210, quest. 80, art. 7). It was decided