Paragraph

 1 19|          touching physical science, history and the like, which cannot
 2 22|           there between physics and history? For whereas physics is
 3 22| consequently square with phenomena, history on the contrary, must square
 4 22|        square with the facts, since history is the written account of
 5 23|            say that we can apply to history and cognate subjects the
 6 24|          this was the true norm for history.[44] A strange distortion
 7 24|            Jerome "the true norm of history" is this: when it is question
 8 46|      commentators and with Biblical history and geography. Such knowledge
 9 51|            metaphorically, for "the history itself is often presented
10 51|            We are not rejecting the history, we are merely giving a
11 52|       riches we seem to despise the history as poverty-stricken."[94]