Paragraph

 1 1|      as writing to impunge the aforesaid constitutions, for the alleged
 2 2|        Our constitution in the aforesaid doctrine defined (as they
 3 2|      to the definitions of Our aforesaid predecessors, they satisfy
 4 2| canonum," asserted against the aforesaid definitions that the Friars
 5 2|    previously mentioned in the aforesaid consideration, namely, that "
 6 2|      men, it is clear that the aforesaid assertors, who hold that
 7 3|     the premise to support the aforesaid doctrine, nemely, that in
 8 3|        which no mention of the aforesaid words is had, so that to
 9 3|     assert in [regards to] the aforesaid words, have been defined.
10 3|        the declarations of the aforesaid Gregory, Innocent and Alexander,
11 3|  direct mention is made of the aforesaid [words]; rather by means
12 3|    that the declaration of the aforesaid Nicholas III may contain
13 3|              however, from the aforesaid words nothing at all can
14 3|     since the intention of Our aforesaid predecessor, Nicholas, was,
15 4|       understood to say in the aforesaid declaration regarding the
16 4|    Christ and the Apostles Our aforesaid predecessor Nicholas made
17 4|       of another right, in the aforesaid declaration, as much as
18 4| according to the saying of the aforesaid Gregory IX, who in a certain
19 4|       This even Alexander, our aforesaid predecessor, seems to have
20 4| Innocent, [and] Alexander, the aforesaid supreme Pontiffs, by whom [
21 4|      contumaciously add to the aforesaid things or to any of the
22 4|      pertinaciously assert the aforesaid things or any of the aforesaid
23 4| aforesaid things or any of the aforesaid things or presume in any
24 4|       clear in the text of the aforesaid sentance of condemnation.~
25 5|       that Christ observed the aforesaid expropriation of all right
26 5|        Moreover because in the aforesaid assertion there is added,
27 5|       of the abdication of the aforesaid right, namely of proptery,
28 5|     that the definition of the aforesaid supreme Pontiffs, which
29 5|     concerning the rule of the aforesaid Friars Minor, (just as they
30 5|     against the statues of the aforesaid Gregory, Innocent, and Alexander;
31 5|        the declarations of the aforesaid precedessors, but that he
32 5|   should emerge in regards the aforesaid things, let this be brought
33 5|    false. For granted that the aforesaid Innocent III interdicted
34 6|  concerning the said rule. The aforesaid Gregory IX, however, neither
35 6|        Moreover concerning the aforesaid Friars Minor what the supreme
36 6|      is well known. Nor in the aforesaid creeds, the Gospel, or the
37 6|        the transactions of the aforesaid order. Whence they cannot
38 6|       cannot conclude from the aforesaid things, except falsely,
39 7|        heresy condemned by the aforesaid constitution and even to