bold = Main text
Chapter, Paragraph grey = Comment text
1 Int, 1 | power and monopoly of the culture of communication in the
2 Int, 1 | the paradigms that hold up culture and cultures. And these
3 Int, 1 | identity.~In the context of a culture of globalization, which
4 Int, 1 | and challenged.~“Identity, culture and vocation” then become
5 Int, 1 | improved or impoverished by culture and cultures, is a fact
6 Int, 1 | mission in relationship to the culture of communication and the
7 Int, 3 | seen in relationship to culture and vocation can offer a
8 Int, 3 | the utopia of a planetary culture and identity, the possibility
9 Int, 3 | capable of assuming one’s culture and be integrated with other
10 Int, 4 | understanding of the present culture and the different cultures
11 Int, 4 | to harmonize identity and culture, in the joyful task of carrying
12 1 | 1. IDENTITY AND CULTURE: DYNAMICS OF INTERACTION~ ~
13 1 | built and designed “within a culture” that forms the basis and
14 1 | differences” (of gender, language, culture,…) against the risk of homologation
15 1, 5 | 1.1. What culture and what identity?~ ~When
16 1, 5 | identity?~ ~When we talk about “culture” we are faced with very
17 1, 5 | relativist mode of understanding culture as a combination of different
18 1, 5 | the universal dimension of culture. 9~“The process of globalization
19 1, 5 | globalization suggests two images of culture: the first image implies
20 1, 5 | extension outside a particular culture toward one’s limit, the
21 1, 5 | integrated in a dominant culture which at the end covers
22 1, 5 | organizational principles; culture is too much to be ordered
23 1 (9)| the traditional concept of culture, understood as a whole of
24 1 (9)| the superiority of western culture. According to Smith a global
25 1 (9)| According to Smith a global culture has no “raison d’etre” because
26 1 (9)| D., A., Towards a Global Culture? In FEATHERSTONE M., La
27 1, 6 | close relationship between culture and identity, because if
28 1, 6 | there is no person without culture, on the other, there is
29 1, 6 | on the other, there is no culture with person. Personal identity,
30 1, 6 | identity takes the form a culture assumes in its subjects,
31 1, 6 | s own models, inside the culture and which one cannot do
32 1, 7 | an “immersion” of one’s culture or through activities of
33 1, 7 | immersed more and more in the culture of his time:~* assimilation,
34 1, 7 | tend to privilege the host culture over that of one’s origin;
35 1, 7 | who come from a different culture, will forget their own belonging
36 1, 7 | their own belonging and culture, that they will learn to
37 1, 7 | abandonment of one’s own culture or one’s ethnic identity,
38 1, 7 | belonging to their original culture and therefore places himself
39 1, 7 | and insertion into a new “culture”; that is, in a new way
40 1, 7 | the corporeal self. Each culture has its way of understanding
41 2, 8 | the Church, society and culture.~To speak of “vocation”
42 2, 9 | environment, or the history or culture in which the person lives.
43 2, 11 | symbols and norms of one’s culture. Such a process demands
44 2, 11 | knowledge of one’s history and culture, also through study and
45 3 | change that society and culture are going through and which
46 3 | of young people and the culture of candidates in formation~-
47 3 | each person and in each culture,~- educate and become
|