|
What kind of
formation?
Therefore it
is necessary that formation evaluate itself against the cultural changes and
the underlying prospects that open. New
cultural paradigms, as a matter of fact, necessarily call into cause the
initial and ongoing formation systems and urge an overall re-thinking of
formation models and processes. Glancing at the technological and cultural
changes deriving from globalization, the pervasiveness of new communications
technologies, the increase of information and new knowledge, but also at the
emerging of new facts, one wonders: “How face all of that, the results of the
technological revolution and the overturning of traditional models of learning
and of transmitting knowledge and values? How situate ourselves in face of the
new ways of living together, of lifestyles, relationships more and more
threatened by the invasion and fascination of virtual reality?” The question is
of no small import.
To do
formation in a world that changes continually, in a time of subjectivity and
fragmentation is not easy. We feel the
need of new signals and new models that will help in a rather complex, often
brand new journey, for religious life, especially that of women.
Organizing
formation itineraries, in tune with change, marked by mobility, newness and
temporariness, is a hard undertaking, both for the Church and educational
institutions, as well as for religious life, which until a couple of decades
ago operated by paradigms of stability or steadiness, rather than on the
dynamicity of a situation in continual and rapid evolution. Many reasons of the present crisis, in fact,
can be reduced to the difficulty of finding models, even mental ones, to live
in the logic of processes and the precariousness of the human condition. Crisis
is present in every transition, and today we are facing a transition toward new
and fresh models, paths still unexplored which await courageous persons who do
not fear the anxiety of uncertainty in face of change.
|