Chapter,  Paragraph

 1  I,1    |           best of hypotheses, small farmers(6) could acquire a meager
 2  I (5)  |         produce of small indigenous farmers;~c) the establishment of
 3  I (5)  |           ban the purchase of small farmers' produce;~d) the imposition
 4  I,1    |       further impoverishment of the farmers and their families.~5. This
 5  I,3    |             large masses of peasant farmers from the land and their
 6  I,3    |             prices and forms of the farmers' payment for land that are
 7  I,3    |            of their families. Small farmers are often forced into debt.
 8  I,4    |           in the interests of large farmers. In yet other cases, tax
 9  I,4    |      investment in land, with small farmers, who are often on the sidelines
10  I,4    |           land, difficult for small farmers if they are not grouped
11  I,4    |         standard of living of small farmers, who often do not produce
12  I,4    | agricultural training prevents such farmers, who of necessity engage
13  I,4    |            the market prompts small farmers to grow export crops, this
14  I,6    |       overcome conflicts with small farmers who have been farming State
15  I,8    |            it even harder for small farmers to obtain legal recognition
16  I,8    |             ownership rights.~Small farmers lose out in every case:
17  I,8    |     investment, increases risks for farmers if they expand their farms,
18  I,9    |      effects described above. Small farmers find it very difficult to
19  I,9    |        credit market, so that small farmers have to turn to money-lenders
20  I,9    |            large landowners, richer farmers or local traders.~Basically,
21  I,10   |            extension work to inform farmers of the existence of such
22  I,10   |         standard of living of small farmers and the very survival of
23  I,11   |  profitability of farming for small farmers. The lack or poor maintenance
24  I,11   |       infrastructures is that small farmers are forced to depend on
25  I,11   |    monopolistic position means that farmers are forced to accept the
26  I,12   |           price. As a result, small farmers see their purchasing power
27  I,14   |           vicious circle when small farmers suffer expropriation by
28 II,2    |            force the poor and small farmers to give up their family
29 II,5    |            the expulsion of peasant farmers from land they have been
30 II,5    |         land on the part of peasant farmers who are not its owners and
31 II,6    |           in order to deprive small farmers and indigenous populations
32 II,12   |            and skill."(48)~The more farmers know about the productive
33 III,1   |       developing agriculture raises farmers' incomes, increases the
34 III,3   |            everyday practice unless farmers are informed of their existence
35 III,3   |          needed in order to provide farmers with sufficient professional
36 III,3   |             vital in order to teach farmers how to join forces and face
37 III,4   |           only alternative for such farmers is, therefore, recourse
38 III,5   |          utility is not confined to farmers and their families, but
39 III (52)|      poorest; it encourages peasant farmers to preserve the productive
40 III (52)|      ownership, it means that small farmers cannot be forced to sell
41 III,9   |          respect the principle that farmers' rights to enjoy the fruits
42 III,9   |            with other countries. If farmers' economic rights are not
43 III,10  |            It can happen that small farmers be penalized on two fronts.