|
The Responsibility of
International Organizations
58. As an instrument of a
developing agriculture, agrarian reform directly touches on the spheres of
competence and responsibility of many international organizations. When these
organizations define the development models they intend to promote, they must
take care that such models are suited to the needs and problems of the various
countries.
It is therefore important to make
sure that concern for reducing international debt — often translated into the
promotion of a predominantly export-oriented agriculture — does not lead
developing countries to pursue policies that will cause serious deterioration
in public services, especially education, and an increase in social problems.
59. Agrarian reform requires
those organizations responsible for promoting international trade to pay
special attention to relations among commercial policies, income distribution
and the satisfaction of families' basic needs.
Development of trade usually has
a positive effect on a country's economic growth, by expanding the market,
stimulating efficiency, and producing new skills and know-how.
However, in certain situations it
can also have detrimental effects on the living conditions of the economically
disadvantaged. This happens, for example, if the increase in the production of
foodstuffs for export leads to a reduction in the supply of food for domestic
consumption and an increase in its price. This has a negative effect because
the products exported are less labour-intensive than
those consumed locally, with the result that employment is penalized.
It can happen that small farmers
be penalized on two fronts. In the first place, the obstacles they run up
against prevent their access to the necessary inputs to grow export crops, so
that they cannot benefit from their advantages. In the second place, the
development of exports brings about rises in certain costs of agricultural
production and in the price of land, and such increases make the production of
traditional crops less financially viable.
However, this series of effects
is not due exclusively to the logic of commercial exchanges. They are also the
direct result of a concentration of land in a few hands, of a widespread social
inequality, and of the inadequacy of technico-administrative
assistance services for small producers. International organizations obviously
have to keep the overall situation carefully in mind when drawing up their own
intervention strategies, because of its negative consequences on the fight
against poverty and hunger.
|