Paragraph

 1 1 |          He raised it to a nobler state. In like manner, this great
 2 6 |       liberty than man has in his state of pilgrimage and imperfection.
 3 9 |    trouble and disturbance to the State. Now, there are other enactments
 4 10|           on the overthrow of the State; but rather in this, that
 5 12|          and an introduction to a state of holiness unknown to the
 6 13|     tyranny, the authority in the State will not have all its own
 7 15|         that the authority in the State comes from the people only;
 8 16|         to individuals and to the State. For, once ascribe to human
 9 18|           not the morality of the State, for that in public affairs
10 18|     separation between Church and State. But the absurdity of such
11 18|    proclaims the necessity of the State providing means and opportunities
12 18|    absolutely ridiculous that the State should pay no attention
13 18|           their government of the State take no account of these
14 18|     Whenever this occurs, since a state of conflict is absurd and
15 21|     considered in relation to the State, clearly implies that there
16 21|        there is no reason why the State should offer any homage
17 21|         be taken as true that the State has no duties toward God,
18 21|        reason itself forbids, the State to be godless; or to adopt
19 21|      religion is necessary in the State, that religion must be professed
20 21|      therefore, the rulers of the State must preserve and protect,
21 22|        wonderfully helpful to the State. For, since it derives the
22 23|          propagate throughout the State what things soever are true
23 23|  insidiously work the ruin of the State. The excesses of an unbridled
24 24|       pleases-a liberty which the State cannot grant without failing
25 29|        for themselves and for the State a license which opens the
26 30|        mean that every man in the State may follow the will of God
27 31| liberalism, however, who make the State absolute and omnipotent,
28 31|        and an offense against the State. Indeed, if what they say
29 34|      acknowledge that, the more a State is driven to tolerate evil,
30 34|       entail greater evils on the State, it would not be lawful;
31 38|         any rate publicly, by the State. How mistaken these men
32 38|          separation of Church and State; whereas it is, on the contrary,
33 39|           two ways. Many wish the State to be separated from the
34 39|          and laws, the offices of State, and the education of youth,
35 39|          separation of Church and State are conclusive; with this
36 39|     respect the Church, while the State may hold her in contempt.~
37 40|        the empire and sway of the State, like any voluntary association
38 41|          separation of Church and State, think nevertheless that
39 43|        for evil is allowed by the State, the power of doing good
40 46|         who wish to assign to the State the power of self-government,
41 46|   opposition, to all parts of the State.~