Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 II, 1,8 | the axiological measure (moral value) of every existing
2 II, 1,9 | The theological and moral point of view sees no substantial
3 II, 1,10 | his very being, and thus a moral value upon which to base
4 II, 1,11(61)| there would be no particular moral reservations. In this regard,
5 II, 1,12 | anthropology but also for moral theology, as is demonstrated
6 II, 1,12 | fundamental criteria for the moral legitimacy of xenotransplantation.
7 II, 1,12 | have clearly upheld the moral legitimacy, in principle,
8 II, 1,12 | second criterion for the moral legitimacy of xenotransplantation:
9 II, 1,12 | from the standpoint of moral theology, the ethical conditions
10 II, 2 | derived from the general moral norms valid for all transplants,
11 II, 3,19 | available. ~A commensurate moral imperative is that of ensuring
12 II, 3,21 | Rev. Maurizio Calipari ~(moral theology, bioethics) ~Pontifical
13 II, 3,21 | Ignacio Carrasco De Paula ~(moral theology, bioethics) ~Professor
14 II, 3,21 | Maurizio P. Faggioni, O.F.M. ~(moral theology, bioethics) ~Visiting
15 II, 3,21 | Bonifacio Honings, O.C.D. ~(moral theology) ~Professor Emeritus
16 II, 3,21 | Professor Emeritus of Moral Theology ~- Msgr. Osvaldo
17 II, 3,21 | Msgr. Angel Rodriguez Luo ~(moral theology, bioethics) ~Professor
18 II, 3,21 | bioethics) ~Professor of Moral Theology ~Holy Cross Pontifical
|