bold = Main text
Part, Chapter, Paragraph grey = Comment text
1 Intro | to another, if applied to man, would offer the possibility
2 I, 1,1(2) | heterotransplantation in man, Ann Surg, 1964, 160: 384. ~
3 I, 1,1(8) | Organs from animals for man, Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol.,
4 I, 1,1(9) | Organs from animals for man, Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol.,
5 I, 1,1(9) | Potential Organ Donor for Man. In: Cooper D.K.C., Kemp
6 I, 2,2(14)| discordant xenografting in man, Transplant Proc 1992, 24:
7 I, 2,2(16)| experimental animals and man, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1966,
8 II, 1 | 1) the acceptability of man's intervening in the order
9 II, 1,7 | possibility itself that man may licitly intervene in
10 II, 1,7 | dignity of the human person. ~Man, created "in the image and
11 II, 1,7 | but also because woman and man have the task of co-operating
12 II, 1,7 | writes in his encyclical "Man is the image of God partly
13 II, 1,7 | carrying out this mandate, man, every human being, reflects
14 II, 1,7 | meaning of the action of man in relation to the created
15 II, 1,7 | authentic and integral good of man (the whole man and every
16 II, 1,7 | integral good of man (the whole man and every man). ~Certain
17 II, 1,7 | the whole man and every man). ~Certain documents of
18 II, 1,7 | of the right and duty of man, according to the mandate
19 II, 1,7 | through the promotion of man. The words of St. Irenaeus
20 II, 1,7 | all their truth: "Living man is the glory of God and
21 II, 1,7 | is the glory of God and man's life is the vision of
22 II, 1,8 | Animals for the Good of Man ~8. For a theological reflection
23 II, 1,8 | own specific value which man must recognize and respect.
24 II, 1,8 | creatures, at the service of man, so that man could achieve
25 II, 1,8 | service of man, so that man could achieve his overall
26 II, 1,8 | of "service" rendered to man by other creatures occurs
27 II, 1,8 | the service of animals to man represents a totally new
28 II, 1,8 | xenotransplantation represents for man a further opportunity for
29 II, 1,8 | irrefutable fact clearly: it is man who has always directed
30 II, 1,8 | in its relationship with man that the axiological measure (
31 II, 1,8 | reality. ~In particular, man has always made use of animals
32 II, 1,8 | spiritual dimensions place man at the centre of the universe,
33 II, 1,8 | animals in order to improve man's chances of survival or
34 II, 1,8 | the relationship between man and animals.(55) Second,
35 II, 1,8 | believe that animals and man have equal dignity and those
36 II, 1,8 | totally at the mercy of man. In the former case, the
37 II, 1,8 | species-ism or tyranny of man over animals. Even reducing
38 II, 1,8 | allowed. In the latter case, man can use animals arbitrarily
39 II, 1,9 | asserts, as stated above, that man is created "in the image
40 II, 1,9 | an important benefit for man, as is the case with xenotransplantation
41 II, 1,9 | of organs or tissues to man, even when this involves
42 II, 1,9 | requirement that in using animals, man must observe certain conditions:
43 II, 1,9 | tissues for transplantation to man.(58) The question of the
44 II, 2,14 | are possibly dangerous for man. Such infections could escape
45 II, 2,15 | significant benefits to man himself. Therefore, while
46 II, 2,15 | species, and reaffirming man's responsibility towards
47 II, 2,17 | as xenotransplantation on man remains at an experimental
48 II, 2,18 | transplant from animal to man, since this therapeutic
49 II, 2,18 | xenotransplantation into man), is ethically acceptable.
50 II, 2,18 | for transplantation into man - should be considered "
51 II, 3,19 | xenotransplantation as applied to man. ~Regarding the xenotransplantation
52 II, 3,19 | sufficient to allow trials on man to begin. ~When the moment
|