|
14.
This general discussion of the ethics of risk must now
be applied to the specific case of xenotransplantation.
First of all, we note
that there are issues connected with xenotransplantation, such as the
probability of rejection and the increase in the probability of infection
because of immunosuppressive therapies, about which some degree of knowledge
already exists, although further study is necessary. The data which the
scientific community already possesses, together with new data being gathered,
can help to establish the threshold of risk that must not be crossed if a
transplant operation to be considered morally acceptable.
More complex and
uncertain is the assessment and evaluation of risks connected to one specific
aspect of xenotransplantation: the possible transmission to the recipient
of infections arising from the xenotransplant (zoonoses) by known or
unknown pathogenic agents which are not harmful to the animal but which are
possibly dangerous for man. Such infections could escape detection, with the
consequent possibility of the spread of the infection to those having close
contacts with the patient, leading eventually to its being spread to the entire
population.
Since clinical
experience of xenotransplantation is quite limited and certainly insufficient
to provide reliable statistics on the real probability of occurrences and
spread of infections, any decision concerning clinical development of the new
therapy can only be based on hypothesis. There is, therefore, an ethical
requirement to proceed with the greatest caution.
When the moment for
clinical application of xenotransplantation arrives, it will be necessary to
select patients carefully, based on clear and well-established criteria,(67) and to monitor the patient very closely and
constantly. One must also contemplate the possibility of placing the patient in
quarantine to prevent the epidemic spread of an infection. Arrangements for
some kind of monitoring of those having close contacts with patient should also
be made.
Moreover, during the
experimental phase of clinical trials, patients should agree not to procreate
because of the possible risk of genetic recombination that could affect the
patient's germ cells. Sexual abstinence would also be necessary to avoid the
venereal transmission of possible viruses.
In the clinical application of xenotransplantation, psychology should also play
an important role. It should address the probable repercussions that the
recipient could undergo in their psyche (e.g. because of the modification of
one's "bodily schema") arising from the acceptance of a foreign
organ,(68) especially when it comes from an animal.(69) In the post-transplant stage, psychology must
also provide clinical support the for the patient in the process of
integration.
|