Paragraph

 1 1 |   separated the Church from the State, were but so many steps
 2 3 |                     3. That the State must be separated from the
 3 3 |       on the principle that the State must not recognize any religious
 4 3 |        limits the action of the State to the pursuit of public
 5 3 |    agreement between Church and State, and the result will be
 6 3 |        separation of Church and State. Our illustrious predecessor,
 7 4 |         true that any Christian State does something eminently
 8 5 |      the same fidelity from the State. This is a truth which no
 9 5 |         can deny. Yet today the State, by its sole authority,
10 6 |         the manner in which the State has effected this abrogation.
11 7 |         energetically. When the State broke the links of the Concordat,
12 7 |   bitter grief to Us to see the State thus encroach on matters
13 7 |     more from the fact that the State, dead to all sense of equity
14 8 |         property the Council of State is the only competent tribunal.
15 8 |      therefore placed in such a state of dependence on the civil
16 9 |    attributes to the Council of State supreme jurisdiction over
17 9 | churches in order to invest the State with this function; when
18 9 |   essence of religion) that the State injures the Church, but
19 9 |         Thus, for instance, the State has not been satisfied with
20 10|    proclaims as property of the State, Departments or Communes
21 11|         Worship, exonerates the State from the obligation of providing
22 11|       obligation assumed by the State to make restitution, at
23 12|       Especially in the present state of Europe, the maintenance
24 13|        separation of Church and State, as deeply unjust to God
25 14|         to the interests of the State. God grant those who are