Paragraph
1 6 | be the direct object of science, and that, as regards history,
2 6 | principle among them that both science and history must be atheistic:
3 7 | the Modernists reply thus: Science and history, they say, are
4 9 | belongs to the realm of science and history yet to some
5 9 | person of Christ, they say, science and history encounter nothing
6 13| inflated with a boastful science, they have reached that
7 15| would not live.~Faith and Science~
8 16| establish between faith and science, including history also
9 16| history also under the name of science. And in the first place
10 16| solely with something which science declares to be unknowable
11 16| separate field assigned to it: science is entirely concerned with
12 16| which is entirely unknown to science. Thus the conclusion is
13 16| dissension between faith and science, for if each keeps on its
14 16| the answer of agnostic science will be in the negative
15 16| faith.~Faith Subject to Science~
16 17| to believe that faith and science are independent of one another.
17 17| another. On the side of science the independence is indeed
18 17| faith, which is subject to science not on one but on three
19 17| falls under the control of science. Let the believer leave
20 17| observation, the judgments of science and of history. Further,
21 17| latter also is subject to science which while it philosophises
22 17| right of philosophy and of science to form conclusions concerning
23 17| to harmonise faith with science, that it may never oppose
24 17| general conception which science sets forth concerning the
25 17| Thus it is evident that science is to be entirely independent
26 17| faith is made subject to science. All this, Venerable Brothers,
27 17| hearer but to make a show of science . . . these, seduced by
28 18| the mutual separation of science and faith. Hence in their
29 18| acting on the principle that science in no way depends upon faith,
30 18| faith must be subject to science, they continuously and openly
31 19| conciliation of faith with science, always, however, saving
32 19| however, saving the primacy of science over faith. In this branch
33 20| that the conclusions of science must always, and in all
34 21| harmonise religion with science and remove opposition between
35 24| have been laid down for science and faith, though in the
36 24| way, then, as faith and science are strangers to each other
37 25| is to be subordinated to science, as far as phenomenal elements
38 28| continues: Let intelligence and science and wisdom, therefore, increase
39 30| history, like ever other science, deals entirely with phenomena,
40 34| chorus, proclaiming that science has made another step forward;
41 36| many passages referring to science or history where manifest
42 36| subject of these books is not science or history but religion
43 36| morals. In them history and science serve only as a species
44 36| masses. The masses understood science and history as they are
45 36| and it is clear that had science and history been expressed
46 38| are to be harmonised with science and history. In the Catechism
47 39| how necessary, too, the science which directs prudence.
48 39| but which testify to a science and a solidity very different
49 39| Modernists make between science and faith. The object of
50 39| and faith. The object of science they say is the reality
51 39| as well as to the man of science. Therefore if any religion
52 42| time or the progress of science (Syll. Prop. 13). They exercise
53 42| and the enemy of light, science, and progress (Motu-proprio,
54 46| of all others that every science and art should serve it
55 47| that the study of natural science in the seminaries be carried
56 57| traduced as the enemy of science and of the progress of humanity.
57 57| learning, the progress of science and other realms of knowledge
|