Paragraph

 1 6 |        religious philosophy in that doctrine which is usually called
 2 6 |        historic Atheism, which is a doctrine of positive denial; and
 3 14|            at once that, given this doctrine of experience united with
 4 14|    experience united with the other doctrine of symbolism, every religion,
 5 15|                        15. But this doctrine of experience is also under
 6 18|    unfrequently to advocate now one doctrine now another so that one
 7 21| subsequently grouped into bodies of doctrine, or into doctrinal constructions
 8 23|             a religious society are doctrine and worship.~Hence the triple
 9 24|         supernatural order. But his doctrine is today repudiated alike
10 25|   instituted it.~ ~The Evolution of Doctrine~
11 27|   consideration of the evolution of doctrine, it is to be noted that
12 27|             of that most pernicious doctrine which would make of the
13 28|            dogma in particular, the doctrine of the Modernists offers
14 28|            the Vatican Council: The doctrine of the faith which God has
15 37|          those they return to their doctrine of immanence. They endeavour,
16 37|            rejecting immanence as a doctrine, employ it as a method of
17 39|             to that most disastrous doctrine of agnosticism. By it every
18 39|             Certainly it is not the doctrine of symbolism - will save
19 39|             to Pantheism that other doctrine of the divine immanence
20 39|             it differ from Catholic doctrine, and why reject external
21 39|          once in Pantheism. Now the doctrine of immanence in the Modernist
22 39|       nothing whatever, even in the doctrine of the Modernist, can suppress.