Paragraph

 1 6 |          credibility, of external revelation. The Modernists simply make
 2 6 |      through the medium of divine revelation, about God and the worship
 3 6 |           anyone says that divine revelation cannot be made credible
 4 7 |       been destroyed, the road to revelation closed through the rejection
 5 7 |     credibility, and all external revelation absolutely denied, it is
 6 8 |            as they understand it, revelation, they say, abides. For what
 7 8 |          more can one require for revelation? Is not that religious sentiment
 8 8 |  perceptible in the consciousness revelation, or at least the beginning
 9 8 |         at least the beginning of revelation? Nay, is not God Himself,
10 8 |        this same religious sense, revelation? And they add: Since God
11 8 |          the cause of faith, this revelation is at the same time of God
12 8 |       they make consciousness and revelation synonymous. Hence the law,
13 8 |          on an equal footing with revelation, and to which all must submit,
14 9 |         the Modernists, faith and revelation spring, one point is to
15 12|           necessary to faith; for revelation, to be truly such, requires
16 28|           These enemies of divine revelation extol human progress to
17 28|        efforts. On the subject of revelation and dogma in particular,
18 28| enunciated in these terms: Divine revelation is imperfect, and therefore
19 39|           and why reject external revelation? If no, we are at once in