Paragraph

 1 5 |        many personalities; he is a philosopher, a believer, a theologian,
 2 6 |           We begin, then, with the philosopher. Modernists place the foundation
 3 14|            Modernist considered as Philosopher. Now if we proceed to consider
 4 14|            differentiated from the Philosopher, it must be observed that
 5 14|         observed that although the Philosopher recognises as the object
 6 14|            in no way concerns this Philosopher. For the Modernist .Believer,
 7 16|           it will be denied by the philosopher as philosopher, speaking
 8 16|       denied by the philosopher as philosopher, speaking to philosophers
 9 19|          employed by the Modernist philosopher, and applies them to the
10 19|          extremely simple one. The philosopher has declared: The principle
11 19| theological immanence. So too, the philosopher regards as certain that
12 29|           studied the Modernist as philosopher, believer and theologian,
13 32|      documents into two parts, the philosopher steps in again with his
14 33|                       33. Then the philosopher must come in again to impose
15 33|           neither of these but the philosopher. From beginning to end everything
16 34|      method of the Modernists. The philosopher leads the way, the historian
17 35|         depends in two ways on the philosopher. First, indirectly, inasmuch
18 35|            as we have seen, by the philosopher; and, secondly, directly,
19 35|            his principles from the philosopher. Hence that common precept