Paragraph

 1 6 |          can never be the direct object of science, and that, as
 2 7 |      Therefore, since God is the object of religion, we must conclude
 3 7 |    within itself both as its own object and as its intrinsic cause,
 4 8 |       add: Since God is both the object and the cause of faith,
 5 12|     inadequate expression of its object, and are usually called
 6 13|     religious sentiment. But the object of the religious sentiment,
 7 14|    Philosopher recognises as the object of faith the divine reality,
 8 14|        the Believer, as being an object of sentiment and affirmation;
 9 16|        it is to be held that the object of the one is quite extraneous
10 16|         to and separate from the object of the other. For faith
11 17|          is said that God is the object of faith alone, the statement
12 19|       the representations of the object of faith are merely symbolical;
13 19|   believer has affirmed that the object of faith is God in Himself;
14 36|       Infinite is to make it the object of contradictory propositions!
15 39| conviction of the reality of the object. But these two will never
16 39|   between science and faith. The object of science they say is the
17 39|     reality of the knowable; the object of faith, on the contrary,
18 47|        contemporaries will be an object of perpetual praise for
19 55|       the truth, seeing that its object is the persons of the saints