Chapter, Paragraph
1 Fwd,3| necessary to contrast the theology of the Orthodox Church with
2 Fwd,4| Pomazansky's Orthodox Dogmatic Theology. As the preface to the English
3 Fwd,4| standard source of Orthodox theology and has a practical approach
4 Fwd,4| of contemporary academic theology. As the preface also states,
5 Fwd,4| used for the correspondence theology course that was the basis
6 Fwd,5| wrote many tomes of learned theology, much of it spiritually
7 1,1 | pride [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, pp. 23-24].~ ~ Here it
8 1,1 | Pomazansky's Orthodox Dogmatic Theology (pp. 344-45), Blessed Augustine
9 1,1 | avoid suffering since its theology does not give a way to deal
10 1,2 | 35) [Orthodox Apologetic Theology, p. 115-16].~ ~
11 1,10| Christ [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, p. 224].~ ~In no place
12 1,11| falsely teaches.~ Orthodox theology strictly differentiates
13 2,6 | Christian Church towards a theology of his liking. His participation
14 2,6 | Cornerstone of Reformation Theology, p. 19].~ ~That the Church
15 2,14| truth.” [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, p. 22.] With this purpose
16 2,14| prefatory notes to this theology course additionally explain
17 2,17| is apophatic or negative theology. While cataphatic or positive
18 2,17| While cataphatic or positive theology proceeds by affirmations,
19 2,17| affirmations, apophatic theology proceeds by negations. Metropolitan
20 2,17| philosophy by means of apophatic theology and apophatic expressions.
21 2,20| answers:~ ~[The devil] used theology. He first introduced a slight
22 2,20| introduced a slight alteration in theology which, once it was accepted,
23 2,20| is what we call Western theology [Emphasis added].~ ~Dr.
24 2,20| correctly discerns that Western theology's “principal characteristic
25 2,20| Emphasis added].~ ~Western theology concludes that “salvation...
26 2,20| explains that in Orthodox theology, the Cross was not a necessity
27 2,20| projection of human passions on theology. It was a return to the
28 2,24| iconography throughout his book Theology of the Icon. This author
29 2,35| Church [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, p. 235].~ ~As noted, an
30 2,36| Church [Orthodox Apologetic Theology, p. 164].~ ~ ~ ~
31 3,5 | outside it [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, p. 235].~ ~Abbot Augustine
32 3,16| inexplicable.” [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, p. 182].~ ~
33 3,17| two centers of Orthodox theology was achieved by placing
34 3,17| and Antiochene Eucharistic Theology, p. 1].~ In the same scholarly
35 3,17| statements of Eucharist theology are two antipodes on a spectrum
36 4,10| the time to study written theology. St. John of Damascus advised
37 4,10| person towards God. Icons are theology communicated in images.~ ~
38 4,11| heart of Iconoclasm was the theology of the Incarnation. Unlike
39 4,12| Icons are a visual form of theology that accomplish a silent
40 4,12| man-within-the-Church.” [Icons: Theology in Color, pp. 20-22.] As
41 4,17| Cornerstone of Reformation Theology, pp. 11-12; emphasis added].~ ~
42 4,17| arguments based on reason. In theology, attention is also given
43 4,17| faith [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, pp. 37-38].~ ~The True
44 4,19| themselves in Protestant theology. Needless to say, this question
45 4,19| Actually, early Western theology (from the incorrect opinions
46 4,19| Platonism. Later Western theology was based on Aristotle,
47 6,6 | fashioning unto itself a new theology without any reference to
48 6,7 | Professor at the Faculty of Theology at the University of Sofia,
49 6,8 | participation of the laity in theology and Church life has always
50 6,9 | individual Church center made to theology in ancient times. Each center
51 6,9 | ruinous effects upon Western theology.~ ~
52 6,13| profoundly affected Western theology for the worse will be fully
53 6,15| the prefatory notes to the theology course. The same notes go
54 6,16| Franco-Latins' scholastic theology. Nevertheless, it was used
55 6,16| result of the scholastic theology of the Franco-Latins and
56 6,16| relationship to Orthodox theology as Christ taught it, the
57 7,9 | Cornerstone of Reformation Theology, pp. 17-19; emphasis added].~ ~
58 7,11| infallibility. Rome's scholastic theology teaches that through the
59 7,11| revelations [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, pp. 357-58].~ ~The Apostle
60 7,14| professor's Orthodox Dogmatic Theology notes, the name of catholic
61 7,14| future development of Western theology and were the stimulus to
62 7,14| foreign to the aim of true theology, which has the very practical
63 7,14| worldliness [Orthodox Apologetic Theology].~ ~However, intellectual
64 7,14| rational philosophy with theology and lent itself to speculation.
65 7,14| unnatural synthesis of theology and philosophy was based
66 7,14| Christian faith. Western theology therefore began to lose
67 7,14| Christianity. In the West, theology was reduced to a system —
68 7,14| intended to “improve” upon the theology of revelation. Moreover,
69 7,14| prove deadly for Western theology, and hence for modern Western
70 7,14| Ages considered Scholastic theology to be a development surpassing
71 7,14| development surpassing the theology of the Fathers, and this
72 7,14| the Franks that Scholastic theology is higher than the theology
73 7,14| theology is higher than the theology of the Holy Fathers. Therefore
74 7,14| Cornerstone of Reformation Theology, a book that has been widely
75 7,14| Cornerstone of Reformation Theology, pp. 44-45; emphasis added].~ ~
76 7,17| Church [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, pp. 27-28].~ ~Fr. Gregory
77 7,20| expressively:~ ~Orthodoxy [views] theology less as an exercise in reason
78 7,20| express an ineffable mystery. Theology in the Catholic West [seems]
79 7,20| nature. In the Orthodox East, theology [seems] to be largely a
80 7,20| sort of dryness in Orthodox theology that I had in the Scholasticism
81 8,6 | relating to Trinitarian theology, not trivial?~ The textbook
82 8,6 | difference in Trinitarian theology is bound to have repercussions
83 8,6 | disastrous effect upon Western theology.~ ~
84 8,14| Persons). Since Western theology views the Son as well as
85 8,14| the Orthodox if Western theology held that there were two
86 8,14| merged and confused. Orthodox theology sees the monarchy as the
87 8,14| the Trinity. In Western theology, the filioque extended the
88 8,14| in Orthodox Trinitarian theology, the principle of unity
89 8,14| God. In Latin Scholastic theology, the Persons of the Trinity
90 8,14| each.~ Latin Scholastic theology, with its emphasis on the
91 8,14| religion and most aspects of theology is largely tied to the question
92 8,14| Church's false Trinitarian theology can be seen in the aftermath
93 8,14| essence.~ In addition, Western theology has in actual fact (if not
94 8,15| the Orthodox Trinitarian theology dealing with God's attributes.
95 9,3 | and likeness.~ Orthodox theology lays a tremendous emphasis
96 9,3 | Moreover, in patristic theology it is said that the image
97 9,15| Church there were many. Thus, theology in the East was more balanced,
98 9,15| balanced, including the theology on salvation. The Orthodox
99 9,15| According to Roman Catholic theology, limbo, from limbus infantum
100 9,28| Christian life [Mystical Theology, pp. 170-71].~ ~The Church
101 9,29| of God [Cf. The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, p.
102 9,29| the point where Western theology is. The metropolitan also
103 9,35| in it. Orthodox mystical theology rejects the notion of Eastern
104 9,39| from a highly developed theology of the body. The relics
105 9,39| annihilated [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, p. 345].~ ~(5) Theosis
106 9,39| that “Orthodox mystical theology is a theology of glory and
107 9,39| Orthodox mystical theology is a theology of glory and transfiguration,
108 9,39| transfiguration, but it is also a theology of penitence.”~ (7) The
109 9,42| Andreyev, Orthodox Apologetic Theology, p. 131].~ ~Dr. Andreyev
110 10,3 | In his Orthodox Moral Theology (in Russian), Professor
111 10,5 | the sense that Orthodox theology never deals with the earthly
112 10,6 | Christ with us [Dogmatic Theology, pp. 262-65].~ ~Above all
113 10,10| of it [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, p. 235].~ ~Orthodoxy does
114 10,10| 3:15) [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, pp. 243-46].~ ~
115 10,11| 11.~ Describe the theology of communion as set forth
116 10,11| textbook calls Orthodoxy's theology of the Church a theology
117 10,11| theology of the Church a theology of communion. This term
118 10,12| Professor at the Faculty of Theology, University of Sofia, Bulgaria,
119 10,12| Scriptures and Orthodox theology. The only branches of the
120 10,14| in an elementary point of theology in this matter, Hieromonk
121 10,15| Cornerstone of Reformation Theology, p. 42; emphasis added].~ ~
122 10,16| members [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, p. 246].~ ~Archpriest Seraphim
123 10,25| representatives of Latin theology, Mary is placed side by
124 10,25| given to God alone. Greek theology is very clear on this point.
125 10,27| not acceptable to Orthodox theology.~ In the Church's Holy Tradition,
126 10,27| anathema [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, pp. 186-87].~ ~Fr. Michael
127 11,3 | replaced with rationalistic theology on the one hand, and frivolous,
128 11,4 | and also with liturgical theology, that is, with Orthodoxy'
129 11,4 | full course of dogmatic theology revealing to us all the
130 11,4 | us in the area of moral theology — the teaching concerning
131 11,4 | garment of truth woven of the theology from above, rightly dispenseth
132 11,4 | piety.” [Orthodox Dogmatic Theology, pp. 38-39].~ ~Orthodox
|