Chapter, Paragraph
1 Fwd,1| grappling with the problems of papal primacy, papal infallibility,
2 Fwd,1| problems of papal primacy, papal infallibility, and Catholic
3 Fwd,2| foundation is its proclamation of papal infallibility, a doctrine
4 Fwd,2| speaking falsehood. However, papal infallibility was vehemently
5 Fwd,2| six of this book notes, papal infallibility continues
6 Fwd,2| teaching. (To this time, papal infallibility is denied
7 Fwd,2| Clearly, there is neither “papal supremacy” nor “papal infallibility”
8 Fwd,2| neither “papal supremacy” nor “papal infallibility” here. Given
9 Fwd,2| Council, Rome's argument of papal infallibility collapses.
10 Fwd,2| to explain its fraudulent papal claims in the face of a
11 Fwd,2| seminarian struggled with Rome's papal claims. When he asked the
12 Fwd,2| hinged upon the matter of its papal claims, which of the two
13 Fwd,3| Contrary to Rome's teaching of papal supremacy, Christ Himself
14 1,1 | stubborn refusal to recognize papal authority, but of Roman
15 1,1 | martyrdom [Quoted in The Myth of Papal Infallibility, pp. 33-34].~ ~
16 1,1 | wanted to base the dogma of papal primacy on those passages.~
17 1,1 | Rom 15:20). The notion of papal primacy is ludicrous to
18 1,11| Rome's divisive doctrine of papal monarchy. This author's
19 1,11| the decrees [Two Paths: Papal Monarchy — Collegial Tradition,
20 3,5 | was to be determined by papal review and approval. There
21 3,5 | all the bishops equally [Papal Letters, Book 5, Letter
22 3,5 | clearly shows that the idea of papal supremacy represents a deviation
23 3,5 | Gregory's opposition to papal authority is well documented,
24 3,5 | Carolingians that initiated papal claims to tremendous worldly
25 3,5 | these claims in the form of papal infallibility until the
26 3,5 | almost nineteen centuries, papal infallibility was denied
27 3,5 | such false dogma, that of papal infallibility, is explained
28 3,5 | before Rome's definition of papal infallibility as dogma in
29 3,5 | IX sought the mantle of papal infallibility at the First
30 3,5 | and schism, the following papal pronouncements-all diabolical
31 3,18| authority — that is, the idea of papal supremacy. It would likewise
32 3,18| rejecting the doctrine of papal infallibility, something
33 3,18| Professor's addendum: Both papal supremacy and papal infallibility
34 3,18| Both papal supremacy and papal infallibility are the result
35 6,7 | establishing the foundation of papal absolutism and dictatorship.
36 6,8 | abandoned in the West with the papal changes of 1046-73. As Professor
37 6,8 | wives. With the rise of papal authority, a striving naturally
38 6,9 | harmonious system?~ (1) Papal claims of universal jurisdiction
39 6,9 | of lust for power and its papal pretenses were contrary
40 6,9 | Vatican still maintains that papal primacy is beyond question.
41 6,9 | web of deceit concerning papal primacy and the primacy
42 6,10| achieved without official papal approval or authorization.
43 6,10| authority on its own. As papal apologists were to argue,
44 6,10| course, the arguments of the papal apologists were not without
45 6,10| of the Creed. Also, the papal apologists failed to mention
46 6,13| the Creed approved by the papal throne was unlawful. Theological
47 6,15| and decisively the idea of papal omnipotence in the Church.
48 6,15| ancestors, and the Western papal Catholics, who after separating
49 6,16| 16.~ How did papal claims and the idea of papal
50 6,16| papal claims and the idea of papal infallibility ensure that
51 6,16| which are the dogmas of papal supremacy and infallibility,
52 6,16| morals.~ The doctrine of papal infallibility was actually
53 6,16| introduction to this book notes, papal infallibility is denied
54 6,16| concerning faith and morals. Papal infallibility is again shown
55 6,16| falsehood, Rome's argument of papal infallibility collapses.~
56 6,16| can be shortened by way of papal indulgences, which were
57 6,16| Rome and the upkeep of the papal palace. But it must be observed
58 6,18| opposed the false teaching of papal infallibility (something
59 6,18| equally false doctrine of papal supremacy) was Johan Josef
60 6,18| proclamation of the heresy of papal infallibility, Dr. von Dollinger
61 6,18| Council — a frontal attack on papal infallibility. In this book,
62 6,18| among which is the fact that papal infallibility was completely
63 6,18| forgeries (see below), that papal infallibility gained ground.
64 6,18| new and false teaching of papal infallibility.~ For Dr.
65 6,18| that the false doctrine of papal infallibility would become
66 6,18| shorn of all defense in its papal claims. For this reason,
67 6,18| Constantine as the “cornerstone of papal power” (vol. 11, p. 586).
68 6,18| advancing the falsehood of papal claims. Finally, however,
69 6,18| explain its utterly fraudulent papal claims in the face of a
70 6,18| importantly — that Rome's papal claims, like all lies, have
71 7,9 | Apostolic foundation, such as papal infallibility — the Orthodox
72 7,11| developed, such as the heresy of papal infallibility. Rome's scholastic
73 7,14| Protestantism placed a papal tiara on every German professor
74 8,14| had a point [Two Paths: Papal Monarchy — Collegial Tradition,
75 8,14| Church and is overemphasis on papal authority.~ East and West'
76 8,14| Schism of 1054 — those of papal claims and the filioque —
77 10,10| earlier, when there were three papal pretenders, it was hardly
78 10,26| dogma was profitable to the papal throne itself since, having
79 10,26| and the life,” proclaimed papal infallibility a dogma of
|