Chapter, Paragraph
1 1,1 | bondage as the time “from the Incarnation of Christ to the coming
2 1,2 | Testament, and that with the Incarnation of God the Word, the Church
3 2,17| that is, the Trinity, the Incarnation, etc). at the Council?~
4 2,19| becoming incarnate. By His Incarnation, death on the Cross and
5 2,20| other solution than the incarnation of His Son, so that a man
6 2,21| sum up the purpose of the Incarnation?~ St. Athanasius states
7 3,11| fullness of the elucidation and incarnation in life of the principles
8 3,12| on Christ Himself and the Incarnation. He further explains that
9 3,13| safeguards the doctrine of the Incarnation — that is, the understanding
10 3,22| concerned with Christ's Incarnation and man's salvation.~ ~ ~
11 4,11| was the theology of the Incarnation. Unlike the former heresies
12 4,11| salvation coming from Christ's Incarnation, Iconoclasm attacked the
13 4,12| Fathers agreed that Christ's Incarnation, His association with men,
14 4,12| teaching of the Church on the Incarnation of God and Divine Wisdom.~
15 4,13| the full meaning of the Incarnation. As the textbook points
16 4,14| Iconoclasm betrayed the Incarnation by allowing no place to
17 4,14| Iconoclasm betrayed the Incarnation in that it allowed no place
18 4,15| the full meaning of the Incarnation and presented a danger to
19 4,15| the consequences of the Incarnation, which is the sanctification
20 4,15| was an attack on Christ's Incarnation and on the whole economy
21 9,13| Cabasilas comments:~ ~The Incarnation was not only the work of
22 9,16| define the act of God's Incarnation?~ The textbook defines God'
23 9,16| The textbook defines God's Incarnation as an act of God's philanthropia.
24 9,17| still have become man. The Incarnation, then, is not seen simply
25 9,18| Because of the fall, the Incarnation of God the Word became even
26 9,18| Because of the fall, the Incarnation became an act of salvation.
27 9,21| harmonious whole. (0. Rousseau, “Incarnation et anthropologie en orient
28 9,35| when becoming Man by the Incarnation,” so Vladimir Lossky explains.
29 9,39| correct understanding of the Incarnation: Christ took flesh (something
30 10,6 | is “the extension of the Incarnation, the place where the Incarnation
31 10,6 | Incarnation, the place where the Incarnation perpetuates itself.” As
32 10,23| participant in the Mystery of the Incarnation counterbalanced Eve's unbelief
33 10,23| there would have been no Incarnation, and consequently no redemption.
34 10,25| denying her role in the Incarnation and the part she plays in
35 10,26| only conclude that Christ's Incarnation could not have taken place
36 10,26| have been no need for the Incarnation of Christ, because Christ
37 11,4 | the great mystery of the Incarnation of the Son of God from the
|