Chapter, Paragraph

 1 Fwd,2|           there is neither “papal supremacy” nor “papal infallibility”
 2 Fwd,3|          Rome's teaching of papal supremacy, Christ Himself forbade
 3  1,1 |       false ideas was that of the supremacy of the bishop of Rome over
 4  1,1 |       gods. The idea of unlimited supremacy in one person over the whole
 5  1,1 |   everlasting battle of Satan for supremacy over the entire world, God
 6  1,11|    especially clearly against the supremacy of the Apostle Peter. If
 7  1,11|         the Catholic dogma of the supremacy of the Roman pope, then
 8  3,5 |   prepared to accord some kind of supremacy of honor, as he himself
 9  3,5 |         equals position was not a supremacy, but was instead a preeminence
10  3,5 |        never asserted any sort of supremacy over the other Apostles.
11  3,5 |          arrogate to themselves a supremacy of power over the other
12  3,5 |      shows that the idea of papal supremacy represents a deviation on
13  3,5 |          popes.~ The falsehood of supremacy of external power and jurisdiction
14  3,5 |          like the teaching on the supremacy of the pope; but for a long
15  3,18|        that is, the idea of papal supremacy. It would likewise entail
16  3,18|  Professor's addendum: Both papal supremacy and papal infallibility
17  5,8 |        refusing to submit to the “supremacy” of the pope.~ Still, the
18  6,15|       inasmuch as the idea of the supremacy of the pope in the Church
19  6,15| substantiation of their rights to supremacy in the whole Church.~ ~Pope
20  6,16|           are the dogmas of papal supremacy and infallibility, the filioque,
21  6,18|           false doctrine of papal supremacy) was Johan Josef Ignaz von
22  6,18|       distinctions and honors. To supremacy in spiritual matters was