Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

1     I, 3,2|  regard this resigna-~tion as valid, considered Photius a usurper.
2    II, 6,2|       Anglican ordinations as~valid: Constantinople (1922),
3    II, 6,2| question ‘Are Anglican Orders valid in themselves, here and
4    II, 6,2|       Anglican ordinations as valid.’ (Note that Orthodox theology~
5    II, 6,2|      to treat the question of valid orders in isolation, but