Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I,Intro | Can-~terbury, Geneva, and Rome; yet in the past such men
2 I,Intro | the Pope and Cardinals at Rome, yet ~they never seem to
3 I,Intro | Church under the Pope of Rome; in the Byzantine Empire,
4 I,Intro | third separation, between Rome ~and the Reformers in the
5 I, 1 | year 107 as he traveled to Rome ~to be martyred. Ignatius
6 I, 2,1 | also religious: the Old Rome was too deeply stained with
7 I, 2,1 | had in mind. In the New Rome things were to be different:
8 I, 2,2 | mention three great centers: Rome, Alexandria, and Antioch (
9 I, 2,2 | the second place, after Rome and above Alexandria. .The
10 I, 2,2 | honor after the Bishop of Rome, because Constantinople
11 I, 2,2 | because Constantinople is New ~Rome. (Canon 3). ~ Behind the
12 I, 2,2 | was re-~sented alike by Rome and by Alexandria. Old Rome
13 I, 2,2 | Rome and by Alexandria. Old Rome wondered where the claims
14 I, 2,2 | where the claims of New Rome ~would end: might not Constantinople
15 I, 2,2 | long claim first place? Rome chose therefore to ig-~nore
16 I, 2,2 | Saint Leo the Great, Pope of Rome (died 461), ~in which the
17 I, 2,2 | stantinople, assigning to New Rome the place next in honor
18 I, 2,2 | next in honor after Old Rome. Leo repudiated this ~Canon,
19 I, 2,2 | them: in order of rank, Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria,
20 I, 2,2 | Holy and Apostolic See of Rome a primacy of honor, to-~
21 I, 2,2 | phrase of Saint Ignatius: Rome.s mistake . so Or-~thodox
22 I, 2,2 | jurisdiction. ~ This primacy which Rome enjoys takes its origin
23 I, 2,2 | from three factors. First, Rome was the ~city where Saint
24 I, 2,2 | that not only the Bishop of Rome but all ~bishops are successors
25 I, 2,2 | admit that the Bishop of Rome ~is Peter.s successor in
26 I, 2,2 | sense. Secondly, the see of Rome also owed its primacy to
27 I, 2,2 | occupied by the city of Rome in the Empire: she was the
28 I, 2,2 | doctrinal disputes, but Rome for the most ~part stood
29 I, 2,2 | Not only the Bishop of Rome, but every bishop, is appointed
30 I, 2,2 | yet because the see of Rome had in practice taught the
31 I, 2,2 | truth, it was above all to Rome that men appealed for guidance
32 I, 2,2 | the primacy assigned to Rome does not overthrow ~the
33 I, 3,1 | the east, alongside Old Rome in Italy. Then came the
34 I, 3,1 | never forgot ~the ideals of Rome under Augustus and Trajan,
35 I, 3,1 | claiming Apostolic foundation . Rome . ~so that Rome came to
36 I, 3,1 | foundation . Rome . ~so that Rome came to be regarded as the
37 I, 3,1 | controversy. Up to 850, Rome and the east avoided an
38 I, 3,1 | its original ~form. But Rome, with typical conservatism,
39 I, 3,1 | Peter.s. For the time being Rome acted as mediator ~between
40 I, 3,2 | his legates returned to Rome, Nicho-~las declared that
41 I, 3,2 | retry the case himself at Rome: a council held under his
42 I, 3,2 | between the Churches of Rome and Constantinople. ~ The
43 I, 3,2 | willing to allow appeals to Rome, but only under the specific
44 I, 3,2 | condemnation, can appeal to Rome, and the Pope, if he sees
45 I, 3,2 | conducted by the Pope himself at Rome, but by the bishops of the
46 I, 3,2 | and demanding a retrial at Rome itself, was going far beyond
47 I, 3,2 | Bulgaria, a country ~which Rome and Constantinople alike
48 I, 3,2 | above all the filioque. At Rome itself the filioque was
49 I, 3,2 | more, and communion with Rome was restored. In 869-870
50 I, 3,2 | Constantinople. Realizing that Rome would allow him less inde-~
51 I, 3,2 | accepted without protest at Rome. ~So Photius ended victorious,
52 I, 3,2 | victorious, recognized by Rome and ecclesiastically master
53 I, 3,2 | coronation of Emperor Henry II at Rome in 1014, the ~Creed was
54 I, 3,2 | therefore, the ~Churches of Rome and Constantinople were
55 I, 3,2 | 1009 aroused no comment at Rome, and even at Constantinople
56 I, 3,2 | confusion for the see of Rome, a century which Cardinal
57 I, 3,2 | history of the Papacy. But Rome now reformed itself, and
58 I, 3,2 | great victory for the see of Rome. Cerularius and his ~synod
59 I, 3,2 | a sinister development. Rome was very far away, and if
60 I, 3,2 | was very far away, and if Rome and Constantinople quar-~
61 I, 3,2 | the separation between Rome and the Orthodox Church,
62 I, 3,2 | p. 13). ~ Orthodoxy and Rome each believes itself to
63 I, 3,2 | points of doctrine; and so Rome and Orthodoxy since the
64 I, 4,1 | understand. Unlike the Church of Rome in the west with its insistence
65 I, 4,1 | s action in appealing to Rome shows that he did not take
66 I, 4,1 | depended on Constantinople ~or Rome, so long as he could continue
67 I, 4,1 | The brothers traveled ~to Rome in person in 868 and were
68 I, 4,1 | Nicholas I.s ~successor at Rome, received them favorably
69 I, 4,1 | the ~city. ~ Cyril died at Rome (869), but Methodius returned
70 I, 4,3 | capitulation to the Church of Rome. ~ Stephen of Perm brings
71 I, 5,1 | opponent of the Church of Rome, and his appointment as
72 I, 5,2 | proclaim the union with Rome, but ~the hierarchy was
73 I, 5,2 | relations between Orthodoxy and Rome from 1596 ~until the present
74 I, 5,2 | hatred of the Church of Rome, and when he became Patriarch
75 I, 5,2 | of Antioch submitted to Rome; after this the Orthodox
76 I, 6,1 | Moscow the third Rome~ After the taking of Constantinople
77 I, 6,1 | supporter of the union with Rome, Isidore returned to ~Moscow
78 I, 6,1 | of Moscow as .the Third Rome.. ~The first Rome (so they
79 I, 6,1 | Third Rome.. ~The first Rome (so they argued) had fallen
80 I, 6,1 | into heresy; the sec-~ond Rome, Constantinople, had in
81 I, 6,1 | Constantinople as the ~Third and last Rome, the center of Orthodox
82 I, 6,1 | which stands no longer Rome or in Constantinople, but
83 I, 6,1 | idea of Moscow the Third Rome had a certain appropriateness
84 I, 6,1 | If Moscow was the Third Rome, then should not the head
85 I, 6,1 | concept of Moscow the Third Rome also encouraged a kind of
86 I, 6,1 | ideal of Moscow the Third Rome; believing in a close alliance
87 I, 6,1 | ideal of Moscow the Third Rome; but it was a qualified
88 I, 6,2 | Zernov, Moscow the Third Rome, ~p. 51). Archdeacon Paul
89 I, 6,2 | regarded Moscow as the Third Rome, and Russia as the stronghold
90 I, 6,3 | Protestant arguments against ~Rome, and Roman arguments against
91 I, 7,3 | solely to the Bishop of Rome. The Patri-~arch and most
92 I, 7,9 | movement in the Church of ~Rome. In 1937, when a group of
93 II, 1,1 | the person of the Father, Rome finds its principle of~unity
94 II, 1,1 | of Augustus, Emperor of Rome. In the same way a~firm
95 II, 2,1 | for the departed. Thus far~Rome and Orthodoxy agree — but
96 II, 2,1 | Orthodoxy agree — but where Rome thinks in terms of the supremacy
97 II, 2,1 | Ecumenical~Council; where Rome stresses Papal infallibility,
98 II, 2,1 | Orthodox it often~seems that Rome envisages the Church too
99 II, 2,2 | visible unity is maintained,~Rome and the east give somewhat
100 II, 2,2 | somewhat different answers. For Rome the unifying principle in
101 II, 2,4 | But~Orthodoxy, unlike Rome, has never proclaimed the
102 II, 3,1 | Traveling~next to Germany and Rome, they found the worship
103 II, 3,1 | Zernov, Moscow~the Third Rome, p. 37; I cite this passage
104 II, 6 | doubt, the schism between Rome and the Ecumenical~59~Church.
105 II, 6,2 | Certainly between Orthodoxy and Rome there are many~difficulties.
106 II, 6,2 | they think of the Church of Rome. More serious than these
107 II, 6,2 | different light.~And if Rome in the past has perhaps
108 II, 6,2 | If the primatial see of Rome were restored once more
109 II, 6,2 | reunion between Orthodoxy and Rome, if it ever~comes to pass,
110 II, 6,2 | 1964; Constantinople and Rome, 1967); on 7 December 1965
111 II, 6,2 | by the Vatican Council in Rome and the Holy~Synod in Constantinople;
112 II, 6,2 | Catholics who separated from Rome after~the Vatican Council
113 II, 7,5 | 1945.~! Moscow the Third Rome, London, 1937.~• W. H. Frere,
|