Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I,Intro | Canterbury in the worldwide Anglican commun-~ion. ~ 4~ This decentralized
2 I, 6,3 | He drew upon German and Anglican books of devotion; his detailed
3 I, 7,6 | early 1950s, a sympathetic Anglican observer remarked: .Hellas,
4 I, 7,6 | adolescence,. to quote an Anglican writer, .when so overwhelming
5 II, 1,1 | Eastern~Church, p. 66). As an Anglican writer has put it: ‘In this
6 II, 2,2 | the Roman Catholic, the Anglican, and~the Orthodox). But
7 II, 3,2 | blessings).~While in many Anglican and almost all Roman Catholic
8 II, 3,2 | Roman ‘Low Mass’ or to the Anglican ‘Said Celebration.’~At every
9 II, 4 | Committee of Romanian and Anglican theologians at Bucharest
10 II, 6,1 | Malines Conversations, ‘The Anglican Church united, not absorbed’).
11 II, 6,1 | challenge, the typically Anglican reply is: ‘We~would not
12 II, 6,1 | the contrast between the Anglican appeal to what is deemed
13 II, 6,1 | In the words of another Anglican writer: ‘It has been said
14 II, 6,1 | sometimes said that the Anglican or the Old~Catholic Church
15 II, 6,2 | sides share in~common.~The Anglican Communion. As in the past,
16 II, 6,2 | official conferences between Anglican and Orthodox theologians.~
17 II, 6,2 | the sacraments, and the Anglican idea of authority in the
18 II, 6,2 | 1935 at Bucharest, with Anglican and Romanian delegates.~
19 II, 6,2 | between the Orthodox and the Anglican communions.’~In retrospect
20 II, 6,2 | many — particularly on the Anglican~side — began to think that
21 II, 6,2 | would soon come when the Anglican and Orthodox~Churches could
22 II, 6,2 | Orthodox Churches and the whole Anglican~communion, was started in
23 II, 6,2 | women priests in several Anglican Churches. The conversations
24 II, 6,2 | concerning~the validity of Anglican Orders. At a first glance
25 II, 6,2 | which seem to recognize Anglican ordinations as~valid: Constantinople (
26 II, 6,2 | Synod of 1935, declared that Anglican~clergy who become Orthodox
27 II, 6,2 | which declared in favour of Anglican Orders have not apparently
28 II, 6,2 | effect. In recent years, when Anglican clergy have approached the
29 II, 6,2 | constitute a ‘recognition’ of Anglican Orders at the present moment.
30 II, 6,2 | answer the question ‘Are Anglican Orders valid in themselves,
31 II, 6,2 | question ‘Supposing the Anglican communion were to~reach
32 II, 6,2 | be necessary to reordain Anglican~clergy?’~This helps to explain
33 II, 6,2 | could declare favorably upon Anglican~Orders, and yet in practice
34 II, 6,2 | into effect so long as the Anglican Church was not fully Orthodox
35 II, 6,2 | present discrepancy between~Anglican and Orthodox belief: ‘The
36 II, 6,2 | recognize the rightness~of Anglican teaching on the sacraments
37 II, 6,2 | and so it cannot recognize Anglican ordinations as valid.’ (
38 II, 6,2 | continues, if in the future the Anglican~Church were to become fully
39 II, 6,2 | pronouncements are concerned. Anglican clergy who~join the Orthodox
40 II, 6,2 | recognize the validity of Anglican Orders.~Besides official
41 II, 6,2 | official negotiations between Anglican and Orthodox leaders, there
42 II, 6,2 | Anglo-Orthodox reunion: the Anglican and Eastern Churches~Association (
43 II, 6,2 | a year; in the past the Anglican and Eastern Churches Association~
44 II, 6,2 | the extreme~ambiguity of Anglican doctrinal formularies, the
45 II, 6,2 | closer relations with the Anglican communion until Anglicans~
46 II, 6,2 | understanding with~the great Anglican Church; but this happy result
47 II, 6,2 | attained ... unless the Anglican~Church itself becomes homogeneous
48 II, 6,3 | the west~— Roman Catholic, Anglican, Lutheran, Calvinist, Quaker —
49 II, 7,11 | Douglas, The Relations of the Anglican Churches with the Eastern-Orthodox,
|