Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1     I,Intro |         Patriarch, and since the ~schism between east and west he
 2     I, 2,2  |  reconciled and formed no lasting schism. But to this day ~there
 3     I, 2,2  |      matters. Thus ecclesiastical schism was reinforced ~by political
 4     I, 3    |              Byzantium: The Great Schism~.We are unchanged; we are
 5     I, 3,1  |           beginning of the great ~schism between the Orthodox east
 6     I, 3,1  |           the Latin west. But the schism, as historians now gener-~
 7     I, 3,1  |      influences were at work. The schism ~was conditioned by cultural,
 8     I, 3,1  |          the actual course of the schism, ~ 22~something must be
 9     I, 3,1  |           was an open and formal ~schism between east and west, the
10     I, 3,1  |           coronation as an act of schism within the Empire. The creation
11     I, 3,1  |           of Charlemagne that the schism of civilizations first becomes
12     I, 3,1  |           Run-~ciman, The Eastern Schism, p. 116). ~ ~That was how
13     I, 3,1  | trangement, but there was no open schism. The two sides had different
14     I, 3,1  |          in Runciman, The Eastern Schism, p. 139). ~ ~In Balsamon.
15     I, 3,1  |      broken; there was a definite schism between east and ~west.
16     I, 3,1  |   transition from estrangement to schism, four incidents are of particular
17     I, 3,1  |    usually known as the  .Photian schism.: the ~east would prefer
18     I, 3,1  |       would prefer to call it the schism of Nicholas); the incident
19     I, 3,2  |              From estrangement to schism: 858-1204~ In 858, fifteen
20     I, 3,2  |           F. Dvornik, The Photian Schism, p. 433). But if Photius
21     I, 3,2  |       there was a second .Photian schism,. but Dr. Dvornik has proved ~
22     I, 3,2  |   conclusiveness that this second schism is a myth: in Photius. later
23     I, 3,2  |           Christendom. ~ Thus the schism was outwardly healed, but
24     I, 3,2  |    enthusiasm, as the author of a schism and little ~ 29~else. His
25     I, 3,2  |      reconciliation. (The Photian Schism, p. 432). In the general ~
26     I, 3,2  |     historical reappraisal of the schism by recent writers, nowhere
27     I, 3,2  |           Crusades which made the schism definitive: they introduced
28     I, 3,2  |         existed in effect a local schism at An-~tioch. After 1187,
29     I, 3,2  |    existed in the ~same city, the schism became an immediate reality
30     I, 3,2  |             Runciman, The Eastern Schism, p. 101). The long-standing
31     I, 3,2  |     recounting the history of the schism recent writers have rightly
32     I, 3,2  |         their reconciliation. The schism was for both parties .a
33     I, 3,2  |           and Orthodoxy since the schism have each claimed to be ~
34     I, 3,2  |          done more to prevent the schism. Both sides were guilty
35     I, 3,2  |        For both parties the great schism has ~proved a great tragedy. ~ ~
36     I, 6,2  |                               The schism of the Old Believers~ The
37     I, 6,2  |     carried reform too far. ~ The schism of the Old Believers has
38     I, 6,2  |    letters. The true cause of the schism lay else-~where, and was
39     I, 6,2  |        persecution which made the schism definitive. Had the development
40    II, 3,1  |           an incident such as the schism of the Old~Believers will
41    II, 6    |           was, without~doubt, the schism between Rome and the Ecumenical~
42    II, 6,2  |      Union’ of Brest-Litovsk, the schism at Antioch in the eighteenth~
43    II, 7,2  |                               The schism between East and West~•
44    II, 7,2  |          S. Runciman, The Eastern Schism, Oxford, 1955.~• R. W. Southern,
45    II, 7,2  |           F. Dvornik, The Photian Schism: History and Legend, Cambridge,
46    II, 7,2  |         1959. Church, Papacy, and~Schism, London, 1978.~70~