Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 3,1 | the Papal claims and the filioque. But before we look more ~
2 I, 3,1 | Greeks for not using the filioque in the Creed ~(of this we
3 I, 3,1 | the Papal claims and the filioque. The factors which we have
4 I, 3,1 | great difficulty was the filioque. The dispute involved the
5 I, 3,1 | Church interpolated the filioque at the third ~Council of
6 I, 3,1 | Court who first made the filioque into an is-~sue of controversy,
7 I, 3,1 | use the Creed without the filioque until ~the start of the
8 I, 3,1 | he himself believed the filioque to be doctrinally sound,
9 I, 3,1 | had the Creed, without the filioque, in-~scribed on silver plaques
10 I, 3,1 | paid much attention to the filioque, but once they ~did so,
11 I, 3,1 | place, Orthodox believe the filioque to be ~theologically untrue.
12 I, 3,1 | fields. Not only does the filioque destroy the balance ~between
13 I, 3,1 | standard Orthodox view of the filioque; it should be noted, however,
14 I, 3,1 | theologians consider the ~filioque merely an unauthorized addition
15 I, 3,1 | issues, the Papacy and the filioque, there were certain lesser
16 I, 3,2 | the Papal claims but the filioque became involved in the dispute.
17 I, 3,2 | fore the question of the filioque, used by the Ger-~mans in
18 I, 3,2 | fasting, and ~above all the filioque. At Rome itself the filioque
19 I, 3,2 | filioque. At Rome itself the filioque was still not in use, but
20 I, 3,2 | by the question of the ~filioque, now brought forcibly to
21 I, 3,2 | the east, denouncing the filioque at length and charging those ~
22 I, 3,2 | Photius really considered the ~filioque heretical, what else could
23 I, 3,2 | Photius who first made the filioque a matter of controversy,
24 I, 3,2 | ies were expelled and the filioque was heard no more in the
25 I, 3,2 | press the ques-~tion of the filioque, nor did he attempt to enforce
26 I, 3,2 | was fresh trouble over the filioque. The Pa-~pacy at last adopted
27 I, 3,2 | which may have contained the filioque, although this is ~not certain.
28 I, 3,2 | the Greeks of omitting the filioque from the Creed! Humbert
29 I, 3,2 | differences of doctrine . the filioque and the Papal claims . which
30 I, 3,3 | recite the Creed with the filioque. But the union ~proved no
31 I, 3,3 | was drawn up, covering the filioque, Purgatory, azymes, and
32 I, 3,3 | ambiguous); they accepted the ~filioque; they accepted the Roman
33 I, 4,1 | language (and of course the filioque), became ~universal. The
34 II, 0,12| sometimes printed (without the filioque) in the Horologion~(Book
35 II, 1,1 | west part company~— the filioque. We have already seen how
36 II, 1,1 | Christendom. But granted that the filioque is important historically,
37 II, 1,1 | the issues involved in the filioque~dispute.~One essence in
38 II, 1,1 | the western position. The filioque leads either to ditheism
39 II, 1,1 | why Orthodox regard the filioque as dangerous and heretical.~
40 II, 1,1 | that, as a result of the filioque, the Holy Spirit in~western
41 II, 1,1 | two consequences of the filioque — subordination of~the Holy
42 II, 1,1 | Orthodox attitude to the filioque, although not all would
43 II, 1,4 | why Orthodox object to the filioque is because they see in it
44 II, 6,2 | two sides — above all the filioque and the Papal claims.~Once
|